Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kurt N who wrote (47151)	5/17/1998 9:53:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Kurt, If Jeff really had a GTC order in the shares would've been purchased, the only nibbles came from Hill Thompson for peanuts. You can contact my broker directly if you wish. In my opinion, TideGlider & other individuals who post here have one purpose and one purpose only, to see that RMIL never trades on behalf of certain shortsellers. They are Dump & Pumpers and they will use any information they gather to prevent us from trading with the float in Name form. I post what I learn, these shareholders are my friends and I care about them. RMCW has gone to great lengths to finalize this merger and it is very close to showtime. It doesn't matter to me about loans, past debts, etc., it doesn't matter this investment is not a MSFT investment, the float is in Name form!! The SEC, as per Hashimi's letter posted here, has given RMIL the green-light, pending 15c2-11 considerations, the 10K is being audited, the merger finalized and, to be honest, they could be bottling cat-spit....we're gonna squeeze!! Pugs SOLIDARITY!!!

To: Kurt N who wrote (47151)	5/18/1998 9:28:00 AM
From: DJ Byrne	Respond to of 55532

Kurt, I did not ask TG not to post, in fact I encouraged him by answering the post, but what I did ask was to supply the information or at least post what this has to do with the operations of RMIL and what it entails. Also if you look at the following post TG has found it necessary to post on another thread LTGL with the same info. To: TideGlider (1581 ) From: Ken Ludwig Sunday, May 17 1998 7:16PM ET Reply # of 1586 Looks to me like standard stuff filed by lessors to establish rights in case of default on such things as equipment leases or in th event of bankruptcy. No reason to think they have anything to worry about here. Good practice for creditors, lets them sleep at night. TG you wouldn't be trying to shake shareholders up would you? You are a shareholder too right? As is Ditchdigger, I'm sure. dj-I know where Pugs is coming from and I am very suspect of where TG is coming from