Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Littlefield Corporation (LTFD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FeringiTrd who wrote (8566)	5/18/1998 7:50:00 AM
From: T.K. Allen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10368

Dave: Both of your questions are good ones and were stressed in the memo compiled here. I presume that a number of people have sent their memo in and some probably edited their version to stress whatever they felt was most important. However, I am somewhat concerned by your comment: "I really doubt that either question will be asked; as management feels that they have a lackey." I am not inclined to take general comments such as this personally. However, I was invited to participate in the last conference call as a representative of this thread. It doesn't take much of a leap of logic, then, to conclude that some of the "softballs" lobbed management's way were from me. I am not concerned about anyone's opinion of the quality of questions I raised. I did my best and everyone is entitled to their own opinion. However, if it was directed towards me, I will take exception to the term "lackey". Just who is it that you consider to be management's "lackey"? TKA

To: FeringiTrd who wrote (8566)	5/18/1998 12:03:00 PM
From: J. Larry Netherland	Respond to of 10368

Dave, I'll take the blame and your "lackey" term as mine. I was on the line and could ask questions and did nothing. Must admit to being absolutely floored! Tod, at least you ask some questions. Dave, I must also admit to being a "red neck" from North Louisiana, so don't press it?!<gg> LET'S GET BACK TO DREAMING! jln

To: FeringiTrd who wrote (8566)	5/18/1998 4:52:00 PM
From: Ed Pettee	Respond to of 10368

Dave - I am not going to engage in a debate on why AB&G asked me to participate in the CC tomorrow. Your opinion that they selected a "lackey" is offensive. Your objective in using the word,which you state is to incite me to ask your so called hardball questions is ridiculous. I notice in your post #8566 that you have a propensity to use descriptive words like "inept" and "crooked" in describing the management of the company. I do not plan to engage in that type of rhetoric. I will consider your questions along with others. PS. Bye the way as a public forum I would be careful of calling company officials "crooked". On another thread (DCI Telecommunications)of which I am a stock holder, the president Joe Murphy, through his attorneys had an individual charged with defamation of character and forced to defend the statement.