Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Tokyo Joe's Cafe / Anything goes -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Copeland who wrote (18671)	5/18/1998 9:40:00 AM
From: Rock_nj	Respond to of 34592

ARXA is moving! Up over 11% already. Small float and several press releases pending. This stock could move significantly!

To: Copeland who wrote (18671)	5/18/1998 9:42:00 AM
From: Panita	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34592

IRSN time to look at a buy at 2.75?

To: Copeland who wrote (18671)	5/18/1998 9:46:00 AM
From: Due Diligence	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 34592

GNII: moving back to old highs after Rvenue announcement.Thanks Copia. Jimbo

To: Copeland who wrote (18671)	5/18/1998 10:10:00 AM
From: Micropicker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34592

Copeland - Boeing and IRSN There is an article just out on XYBR which is optimistic about the use of wearables in government, military, and commercial applications. The key reason I place some plausibility in the rumor is that Boeing is paying IRSN to develop the wearable not strictly for it's own use but "for military use"! So, if the army wants to spend a few billion to buy a few hundred thousand of these things, is Boeing going to act solely as the general contractor, or are they going to want to the whole pie? The whole pie costs only $70 million today (market cap), and with IRSN's stacked chip technology, these are the ONLY wearables that will be small enough and rugged enough for use in combat. Who's going to sell wearables to the Army - Sony or Boeing?