SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (19262)5/18/1998 12:35:00 PM
From: esterina  Respond to of 24154
 
Great news! The BROWSER SHARE is the dominant factor for the case. Go Netscape. I don't think MSFT has any recourse here.



To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (19262)5/18/1998 1:11:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Respond to of 24154
 
Yeah Reggie, everything is irrelevant, except for Reggie's gospel, which I will again contribute the concise version. Microsoft Rules. Doesn't matter how or why.

As for the DOJ's "anticapitalist" proposals, the NYT said the negotiations were a non-starter from the first meeting, the proposal that got them going was pulled before anybody showed up at the table. The integrity and uniformity of the Windows experience was just too valuable to put on the table. How anyone can be anything but sarcastic about said integrity and uniformity beats me.

As for Resurgent Spyglass, the Times had their story on who they thought killed them, and it wasn't Netscape. But the Times was just selling advertising again, the Mind of Reg(TM) knows the truth.

Oh, and as to the Justice Department picking sides, here's another unlikely recruit to the press division of the nefarious international ilk conspiracy.

The real question is whether Mr Klein has sufficient evidence to justify a full-scale antitrust action against Microsoft. There is nothing wrong with the fact that Windows is a monopoly-it was legally acquired and both the computing industry and its customers have benefited from the product's ubiquity and from Microsoft's commitment to keep improving it. However, there is plenty of evidence already in the public domain of the software giant's systematic use of its market power and vast wealth to destroy a competitor which fleetingly appeared to threaten the dominance of Windows. Netscape may have contributed to its own difficulties, but Microsoft reserves a special ruthlessness for any company that dares to take it on directly. It is a safe bet that the Justice Department and the 13 state regulators have gathered enough material to establish a prima facie case.

That from an editorial in the 5/9/98 Economist, that well known commie rag, formerly Bill's favorite periodical. They're just trying to sell advertising, of course. Unfortunately, I can't offer a URL this time, I posted it before but they only leave things up for a week.

Why don't you just join the "unfair to Bill" whiners over at How High, Reg? You get a free ride there.

Cheers, Dan.



To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (19262)5/18/1998 3:31:00 PM
From: nommedeguerre  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
Reggie,

>>The government is simply picking sides. The most excaberating point is that they are not doing it arbitrarily, but gravitating to the heftiest lobbying dollar, currently spent by the NOISE.

Is this an emotional government conspiracy response or do you have actual proof that lobbying dollars are at work?

Cheers,

Norm