To: Wally who wrote (1806 ) 5/18/1998 3:35:00 PM From: Michael T Currie Read Replies (1) | Respond to
> Jim: Reluctantly, I have to agree with you. There's a great deal of hype and high hope on the FNTN thread. I think we have a couple of classic pumpers, too. I don't excuse myself from the list of those supporting the high hope euphoria.
Count me in for the comments on euphoria. I don't think these guys are actually 'classic pumpers'. They haven't made any specific claims about impending news or services. I have to admit, the back-slapping jocularity is a bit much. No substance, waste of bandwidth.
Regardless of supposed comments to the contrary, I am bothered about the further delay in the web site. So far it's nothing that I couldn't put together myself in a reasonable amount of time. I don't buy the story about 'not putting it into place until it's just right'. The 80% solution should be nearly as easy to load up and maintain as the present site.
Last, but perhaps not least, I have never, ever seen any justification for using TA on penny stocks (sorry, TechnoWiz). There are simply far too many outside influences that are not predictable. My opinion only.
Having said all this, I bought more shares last week. It is not the company that I am having a problem with (except the web site) nor even specific individuals. It's the tone that this thread has taken over the past few weeks. You know, 'hold on to your stock regardless of what the price does in the short term' and 'the longer the base, the higher and faster the subsequent rise'. Well, guys, we just had better than a triple, which is a pretty good rise in most peoples' books.
I've had my say. I am quite sure that I have offended several shareholders here. So be it.
Mike
