SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Loral Space & Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dragonfly who wrote (3009)5/18/1998 2:48:00 PM
From: scott  Respond to of 10852
 
What is Mother Jones 400 ?????

The Mother Jones 400

Summary: Bernard L. Schwartz tops the list of the 400 people who contributed the
most money to candidates and political parties during the 1996 election cycle.

Mother Jones
May-June 1997

...

ORBITER OF POWER

His political savvy helped him get a jump on the world satellite market.

Bernard L. Schwartz, 71, New York, N.Y. Party: Both. The problem for Bernard
Schwartz was this: How does an aggressive New York businessman who's no more
than a blip on the Beltway radar screen break into the tightly knit ranks of
those aerospace executives invited to talk turkey with the secretary of
defense a couple of times a year?

He did it the old-fashioned way: He gave money. Schwartz, the CEO of Loral
Space & Communications, has given massive contributions to Democrats and a
whopping $217,000 since 1993 to the Democratic Leadership Council (the
political group Bill Clinton once chaired). And he's done far better than
merely getting access to the secretary of defense. Last fall the
administration actually considered Schwartz as a candidate for the defense
post. Then last December, after his election contributions topped all
others, Schwartz received the ultimate sign that he had arrived: He
celebrated his 71st birthday with an intimate White House dinner with the
president.

Schwartz, who declined to be interviewed for this article, is an anomaly in
the aerospace industry, which is mostly captained by Republican-leaning
engineers and former military officers who fly their own planes. Schwartz--a
Brooklyn native, a Wall Street veteran, and a lifelong Democrat--has
sometimes stirred resentment among other aerospace executives, who sense
he's in aerospace not out of patriotism, but simply in order to make money.
They can't argue with his success: Since acquiring Loral in 1972 he has
transformed the company, then worth $7 million and near bankruptcy, into a
$3 billion giant.

Although no one questions Schwartz's Democratic leanings, his recent giving
has raised eyebrows. "When I was there, [Schwartz gave] only begrudgingly,"
says a former Loral executive. "There's obviously a clear business rationale
for this."

For one, Schwartz's contributions may have prompted favorable treatment from
regulators and lawmakers. In 1993 the Clinton administration and the
then-Democratically controlled Congress approved a law allowing defense
companies to charge taxpayers for the costs of mergers and acquisitions.
Schwartz capitalized on the legislation last year when he sold Loral's
defense business to Lockheed Martin, reportedly pocketing close to $27
million in personal stock gains. In fact, Schwartz has been the industry's
most aggressive buyer and seller for years, and each of his many deals was
approved in short order by the Pentagon and the White House. "The Democrats
have not messed with any antitrust issues in defense," says former Assistant
Defense Secretary Lawrence Korb. "With Schwartz buying and selling as he
has, he's done pretty well."

Since selling Loral's defense-related operations to Lockheed, Schwartz has
focused much of his attention on Globalstar, a Loral venture he hopes to
turn into a giant in global satellite telecommunications. Such
satellite-based services would let you call your office from the ski slopes,
reach the main office from the Himalayas, or download stock tips while on a
fishing trip in Chile.

Globalstar's prospects were helped considerably by Ron Brown, the late
secretary of commerce, who invited Schwartz to travel with him on at least
two international trade missions. One 1994 trip to China proved particularly
lucrative: As a result of negotiations that began there, Schwartz reeled in
satellite transmission rights in China worth billions. Since then, he has
landed exclusive agreements with phone companies in more than 100 countries,
including France and Brazil.

The U.S. Trade Representative's office has also helped Globalstar by
convincing 68 nations that attended a World Trade Organization meeting in
February to open their telecommunications markets to foreign providers much
sooner than expected. It's a huge boon for U.S. satellite makers--and
Globalstar, which is set to launch its 56-satellite service in 1998, has a
jump on most of the competition.

Schwartz's current goal, according to Loral lobbyist Steven Flajser, is to
obtain a rewrite of a 1964 international agreement that limits how many
companies can get into the global satellite business. Coincidentally or not,
Clinton advocates rewriting the agreement so that it would allow U.S.
companies such as Loral to put more commercial satellites in orbit.

In addition to his own contributions, Schwartz also avails his political
friends of another tremendous resource: Loral employees. 'At certain times,
memos came out to key executives asking for contribution checks," says a
former Loral employee.

According to 1995-96 FEC records, more than 300 Loral employees contributed
at least $300,800 through Loral PACs to 186 members of the House and Senate,
especially to candidates on crucial committees, such as Rep. Jane Harman
(D-Calif.), who sits on the House National Security Committee. In addition,
62 Loral employees gave $22,100 directly to Harman in 1996.

Last August, Schwartz put on a fundraiser for Harman near Loral's Palo Alto,
Calif., offices. Loral employee John Brock, a registered Republican, says he
did not attend, but later wrote out a $250 check to Harman's campaign. Asked
why he contributed to a Democratic congresswoman who represents a district
350 miles away, Brock says, "She's very outspoken in support of our
industry." Brock then adds that he also gave because the fundraiser was
organized by his boss.

Harman declined to discuss her relationship with Schwartz, but did take the
time to notify Loral that Mother Jones had called her office. "If you call
us about Bernard Schwartz," says Mark Kadesh, Harman's chief of staff,
"we're going to tell Bernard Schwartz."

But a Republican congressman who has known Schwartz for years was less
reluctant to speak--provided he wasn't identified by name: "Let me tell you,
that fuckin' guy, he always pushed the envelope with me. He always came by
and asked for things."

Meanwhile, Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), the top Democrat on the Senate Armed
Services Committee, collected at least $12,000 from Schwartz and a Loral PAC
for his successful 1996 re-election campaign. Schwartz, Levin says, gives
primarily because he is a Democrat. However, the senator adds, "Has he ever
raised [a business] issue with me at any time? I can't tell you that he
hasn't."



To: Dragonfly who wrote (3009)5/18/1998 2:55:00 PM
From: scott  Respond to of 10852
 
That is what I heard ... I hope you are right. While I disagree with his politics. I think his strategy is right on....the stock is a slam dunk and this is a fire sale. It would bother me if they had sold missile technology to the chicoms....

Scott



To: Dragonfly who wrote (3009)5/19/1998 8:05:00 AM
From: scott  Respond to of 10852
 
There is no evidence that Loral sold missile technology to anybody, including the Chinese. That is not even what the allegations are about.

I guess Justice and the Senate are making the allegations.

China's influence on Clinton to be
probed, Lott says

By Nancy E. Roman and John Godfrey
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott said yesterday that Congress will
investigate charges that money funneled by the Chinese government into
Democratic campaign coffers influenced President Clinton's decision to
approve technology transfers to China.
ÿÿÿÿÿThe Mississippi Republican also suggested that giving China satellite
technology might have prompted India to conduct a series of nuclear tests last
week that have roiled South Asia.
ÿÿÿÿÿ"We are very much alarmed by the passing of technology to China that
helps their satellite and therefore their missile technology," Mr. Lott said.
ÿÿÿÿÿ"There are very legitimate questions about how that decision was made,
how that has strengthened China's hand and, of course, did campaign
contributions affect that in any way," he said.
ÿÿÿÿÿMr. Clinton's decision to approve the export of satellite technology to
China allowed two U.S. space firms -- Loral Space and Communications Inc.
and Hughes Electronic Corp. -- to export satellites to be launched on Chinese
rockets.
ÿÿÿÿÿThe Justice Department is probing whether Mr. Clinton's decision was in
any way related to $600,000 in contributions from Loral Space to the
Democratic Party.
-- Continued from Front Page --

ÿÿÿÿÿBriefing reporters yesterday, Mr. Lott wondered aloud if the satellite
accord had "contributed now to the problem in the whole region."
ÿÿÿÿÿ"Did the additional technological capability by China, for example, cause
India to begin taking more actions?" he asked.
ÿÿÿÿÿMr. Lott's linking yesterday of the Chinese technology sales and the
Indian nuclear blasts came as China's official media assailed India for the test
and a top Indian official labeled China his country's top military threat.
ÿÿÿÿÿChina's Xinhua news agency said that by citing a threat from China as a
reason for the tests, the Indian government of Prime Minister Atal Bihari
Vajpayee was putting forward "lame excuses."
ÿÿÿÿÿSenate Minority Leader Tom Daschle acknowledged many unresolved
questions about Chinese influence in U.S. campaigns but said the Justice
Department investigation is sufficient.
ÿÿÿÿÿ"There are a lot of unanswered questions that have to be resolved, and I
think the best way to resolve them is with a complete investigation on the part of
the Justice Department," he said.
ÿÿÿÿÿMr. Daschle said a congressional probe is not appropriate unless it is
linked to legislation aimed at revamping the federal election law that governs the
way campaigns are financed.
ÿÿÿÿÿ"If the Republican leadership and Republican members are unwilling to
move campaign reform, then I don't think hearings are productive," he said.
ÿÿÿÿÿSen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York is the only Democrat so far to
call for an independent counsel to investigate the charges.
ÿÿÿÿÿMr. Moynihan has said the evidence suggests an attack on the U.S.
political system by the Chinese.
ÿÿÿÿÿ"And we'd better find out about it, and the best way to do it is an
independent counsel," he said. "I still think that."
ÿÿÿÿÿRepublicans see an opportunity to resuscitate the flagging
campaign-finance investigation. The Senate hearings have concluded and the
House probe has erupted into a bitter partisan debate over the approach and
tactics of House Government Reform and Oversight Committee Chairman Dan
Burton, Indiana Republican.
ÿÿÿÿÿBut the new reports of a possible quid pro quo involving Chinese money
and satellite technology have proven explosive on Capitol Hill. Even Democrats
have gone out of their way to criticize it.
ÿÿÿÿÿIf evidence emerges of a quid pro quo, "the person should be indicted and
put in jail no matter who it is," said Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr., Delaware
Democrat and ranking minority member of the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee.
ÿÿÿÿÿSen. John Glenn, Ohio Democrat, who is retiring this year, said he
expects more to "come out on this yet."
ÿÿÿÿÿ"I hope the Justice Department continues just as hard as they can on this
thing," he said. "I want everything to come out with regard to this."
ÿÿÿÿÿThe official Democratic Party line offers campaign-finance reform as the
solution to any improprieties uncovered in the investigation.
ÿÿÿÿÿ"I believe we need to get to the bottom of that, but we have about seen our
fill of independent counsels," said Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg, New Jersey
Democrat, adding that the issue raises a need for campaign-finance reform.
ÿÿÿÿÿSen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts seemed resigned to a new
round of investigations by congressional committees.
ÿÿÿÿÿ"We'll see what they recommend," he said with a shrug.
ÿÿÿÿÿRepublicans were more aggressive, seeing in the potential scandal an
opportunity they can exploit in the November congressional elections.
ÿÿÿÿÿHouse Speaker Newt Gingrich called the allegations chilling and has said
Mr. Clinton should not go to China next month until he answers "serious
questions," a view echoed by Sen. Tim Hutchinson, Arkansas Republican.
ÿÿÿÿÿ"It is inconceivable to me how you could go forward with your planned
June 24th trip to China," Mr. Hutchinson said in an appeal to Mr. Clinton. "The
cloud now brewing over your administration's relationship with the leadership
of the People's Republic of China makes suspect any agreements that may be
reached or any statements that may be made at this summit."