Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (19343)	5/18/1998 8:28:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

&#133not if you have a personal computer OS with 90% marketshare and you toss in the browser. &#147ISP's are the most effiective way of getting the browser distributed.&#148 You really, honestly don't see the unfair leverage here? (serious question) -MrBT

To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (19343)	5/18/1998 10:47:00 PM
From: Dermot Burke	Respond to of 24154

< ISP's are the(2nd) most effiective way of getting the browser distributed> OEM contracts are the most effective, Regimondo. So sorry to insist on the facts, sir. This is why they do protest so: " Discussing the possibility of separating the Windows 98 operating system, or OS, and Internet Explorer, a company memo noted that if the products "are decoupled, then Navigator will have a good chance of winning."

To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (19343)	5/19/1998 4:32:00 PM
From: Keith Hankin	Respond to of 24154

ISP's are the most effiective way of getting the browser distributed. No. Having a browser preinstalled on your computer is a much more effective way of distributing it. <How many NSCP products have you used?> About eight Which products, and to what extent did you use them?