SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: djane who wrote (47103)5/18/1998 11:52:00 PM
From: pat mudge  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
**OT** Dennis, I received my T-shirts today. My wife now thinks I'm a complete geek. I don't know if I'm brave enough to wear it in public. djane

"Silicon Investor" T-shirts????

My daughters' girlfriend who's anatomically related to Dolly Parton wears one with pride.

Sorry, couldn't resist. :))

Pat




To: djane who wrote (47103)5/18/1998 11:58:00 PM
From: Dennis R. Duke  Respond to of 61433
 
OT

My wife often has said "The market is not open! What are you doing on that computer! Get off it right now and get a life!"

Seems they don't understand. Kind a like I don't understand her desire to read medical texts for hours. (I really do understand, she is a Nurse Practitioner and wants to practice her profession well.)

I found it really revealing once when I had worked all day on some drywall work in the house and my wife came home and said "Is that all you've done all day?", "Sure does not look like much." It gave me a different prespective of anything I might have said when I came home from the office - that is when I had one to go to!

There are two sides to anything. If the two sides share what and why they are doing it, they can work together. And together is power.

IMHO, Dennis



To: djane who wrote (47103)5/19/1998 12:42:00 AM
From: djane  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
5/18/98 America's Network. Data's best-kept secret [Very bullish on frame relay]

americasnetwork.com

Annie Lindstrom

While asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) grabs the headlines, frame relay is quietly making a fortune for carriers. In 1992, industry analysts wondered if
there was a market for the service which, in 1991 had brought in only $2
million in revenue from 36 paying customers, according to Rosemary Cochran,
principal of Vertical Systems Group (Dedham, Mass.).

In five short years, frame relay has carved a $6.1 billion niche in the global data market (see figures), Cochran says. Worldwide, frame relay generated $3.9 billion in revenues last year. Today, more than 25,000 enterprises use the service. Frame relay will continue to prosper, she adds, noting that there will be more than 1 million billable ports in service by the end of 1999.

Although there has been much interest in Internet protocol (IP) and IP-based virtual private networks (VPNs), speculation that IP VPNs will replace frame relay is tempered by the huge installed base of frame relay lines and equipment.

"There are 425,000 sites using frame relay for remote access. That's a big
installed base," Cochran says.

In fact, it's quite likely that future VPNs will employ frame relay, rather than replace it. Additional hot opportunities for frame relay service providers include Internet access, managed services, and the transport of delay-sensitive traffic such as voice over frame relay (VOFR) and Systems Network Architecture (SNA).

"SNA over frame relay is the single largest untapped opportunity for frame relay service providers," Cochran says.


According to Sprint Business (Dallas), 50,000 companies currently use private line-based SNA for mission-critical back-office functions such as payroll, order
entry and inventory control.

At N+I, Sprint Business announced an agreement with IBM (Armonk, N.Y.), the developer of SNA, to provide an end-to-end solution which should help SNA customers migrate to frame relay with minimum risk. The solution will be available in the third quarter.

In addition, 14 Frame Relay Forum members demonstrated frame relay's ability to transport all types of traffic, including voice, video, data and imaging on a single link, as well as performance monitoring and service-level administration.



Back to home

Copyright 1998 Advanstar Communications. Please send any technical comments or
questions to the America's Network webmaster.



To: djane who wrote (47103)5/19/1998 12:55:00 AM
From: djane  Respond to of 61433
 
Supercom '98 Preview

internettelephony.com

May 18, 1998

Your show of shows?

Supercomm tries to adapt to its morphing surroundings

JASON MEYERS

There will be new technologies on display at this year's Supercomm show, but most
will be descendants of ones that began to take root years ago. There will be
improvements, developments, enhancements--new spins on old stories. But all of it
will look vaguely familiar.What is changing is the audience--real or intended--for
which all this technology is spun. Supercomm has long been the quintessential event
for traditional telcos, at least in theory. In recent years, though, the show's mission
has been expanded to appeal to the emerging competitive service provider markets
in both the wireless and wireline sectors.

These days, optical transport solutions such as dense wavelength division multiplexing
are positioned to appeal not only to the long-haul interexchange carrier market but
also to the incumbent and competitive local exchange carrier markets that
increasingly are examining such solutions for their metropolitan networks. New
access solutions such as digital subscriber line--in all its various forms--now appeal
to a broader range of carriers.

Wireless solutions, too, are geared not only toward traditional cellular and PCS
operators, but also toward CLECs that intend to use wireless platforms just as they
will use any other broadband access methods. As for the established wireless
players, they likely will look not for voice solutions, but for ways to expand their
existing voice networks to add data components to their offerings.

The reason for this alteration in technological positioning is no doubt the explosion in data networking and the profitability it poses for all types of operators. High-speed Internet access in particular and data transmission in general have all but seized the collective industry consciousness over the past year, and Supercomm is struggling to keep up.

The show has long tried to be all things to all corners of the industry, at times against all odds. That effort is probably most clearly demonstrated by the technology
"pavilions" in areas such as wireless that are there every year but never seem to
generate as much interest as more narrowly focused shows.

Yet the burgeoning data industry might be Supercomm's coming of age. Data networking crosses all intra- and extra-industry borders--for proof, look at traditional enterprise network shows such as ComNet and Networld+Interop that have suddenly attracted the attention of public network operators and their vendors.

Suddenly, the telecom industry's classic trade show overachiever may be the best bet in town for exhibitors and attendees. Given data's range, Supercomm's broad vendor focus and the wide audience range could, if executed correctly, be exactly the kind of all-encompassing venue the industry needs to crystallize all that is occurring.

Throughout the pages of this, Telephony's annual Supercomm preview issue, our editors dissect the contents of this year's show, technology sector by technology sector. From switching and transport systems to access platforms to wireless networks to software and beyond, all regions of the show and the industry it represents are broken down in these pages.

As is often the case in telecom, Supercomm will encapsulate an industry in flux. This time the flux surrounds the area of data networking, and Supercomm will try to act as the collective industry voice to identify and speak the trend.



To: djane who wrote (47103)5/19/1998 1:33:00 AM
From: djane  Respond to of 61433
 
Experts ask: Is Bay in play?

By Jim Duffy
Network World, 5/18/98

nwfusion.com

Reports that Bay Networks Inc. refused a
buyout offer from Nortel spiked Bay's stock by
16 percent this week and whipped up a flurry of
rumors and speculation.

Bay and Nortel officials would not comment, but
sources said Nortel wants to announce a Bay
acquisition at the Supercomm 98 show in Atlanta
June 8.

The amount of the alleged Nortel offer is not
known, but sources say it was between US$32
and $35 per share, or $7.3 billion to $8 billion.
Bay shares are currently trading at $26.38.

Observers believe Bay will agree to be acquired
for $40 per share, or $9.1 billion. The company's
market cap is currently $5.5 billion.


The time is now at hand for Bay, Cabletron
Systems Inc. and even perhaps 3Com Corp. to
woo a telecom suitor in order to compete with
Cisco Systems Inc. in the voice/data megabattle
of the next millennium.

Cisco is the pre-eminent supplier of IP routers
for the enterprise and service provider markets.
The network giant became an instant force in
WAN switching with its $4 billion purchase of
StrataCom Inc. two years ago.

With the industry moving toward converged
voice and data over IP networks, Cisco is
entering the ranks of the Nortels, Lucents, LM
Ericssons and Siemens AGs of the world and
leaving its Big Four brethren behind. But while
Cisco chases Nortel, Lucent Technologies, Inc.
and others, Bay, Cabletron and 3Com are still
chasing Cisco.

Unfortunately, Bay, Cabletron and 3Com lack
the financial, market and R&D where-withal to
catch Cisco on their own, observers say.
However, Nortel, Lucent and other telecom
powerhouses lack data expertise.


It therefore behooves Bay, Cabletron and 3Com
to beautify their enterprise assets to attract and
marry one of the telecom heavies. And this
week's alleged Bay/Nortel overture is yet
another indication of the need to woo a suitor.

"It's symptomatic of the ongoing, continuing
convergence of the voice and data world, and
the pressures to establish a critical mass," said
Andy Schopick of Nutmeg Securities. "I
wouldn't dismiss [these reports] as being some
ridiculous thing. If it's not Nortel [coveting Bay], it could be somebody else, and I think we will
see one or two megamergers over the next six to
12 months in the networking arena."


"Bay's been in play the whole time," said Scott
Heritage, an analyst at UBS Securities in New
York. "This is not new. There's been speculation
going on [about a possible acquisition] for the
last six months."

Before this week's development, the popular
belief was that Lucent would make a run at Bay,
given that the companies have a multimedia
technology sharing and joint product
development partnership going back two years.
More recently, Lucent acquired Yurie Systems,
Inc., a maker of ATM access multiplexers, that
Bay is reselling under an OEM arrangement.

Conversely, Nortel has been allied with
Cabletron for more than a year in a "Power
Network" partnership to build integrated
voice/data multimedia networks. But analysts
note this union has produced little, if any, power
to date.

3Com, meanwhile, has a partnership with
Newbridge Networks, Inc. and Siemens to
deliver desktop-to-desktop class of service over
IP networks.

Its relationship with Lucent aside, Bay might be
better served to wait until October to wed a
telecom company. October is when Lucent is
allowed to use the pooling of interests method to
acquire a company.

Pooling of interests allows companies to combine
balance sheets and report higher earnings without
tax impact. Lucent was prohibited from pooling
for two years after being spun off from AT&T.

Not only would pooling be attractive for Lucent,
it might raise the price for Bay because Nortel
and Lucent could get into a bidding war for the
company. Indeed, some speculated that any
Nortel offer would be a preemptive move to
swipe Bay from rival Lucent before October.


Users seem resigned to the prospect of Bay
being snapped up sooner or later.

"It probably would just make them stronger,"
said Randy James, vice president of development
at Community First Bancshares, Inc. in Fargo,
North Dakota. 'It probably would make sense
for a combination like that, but I don't see that
there's any-thing [Bay is] lacking strategically."

Feedback | Network World, Inc. | Sponsor
Index
Marketplace Index | How to Advertise |
Copyright

Home | NetFlash | This Week | Industry/Stocks
Buyer's Guides/Tests | Net Resources | Opinions |
Careers
Seminars & Events | Product Demos/Info
Audio Primers | IntraNet