SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Terry T. who wrote (7146)5/19/1998 8:15:00 AM
From: I Am John Galt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18444
 
What about your(both you and Partytime's) constant character/motive bashing? What about the false allegations of David Sirk and I in cahoots? Why are my accusations about the company any worse than your accusations about David and I? I don't even know David.

I will say that it is only my opinion that they are practicing illegal practices, and I have shady evidence to back my opinions up. I have documented evidence of lies(white lies, or whatever), and I have some other evidence of funny business. None of this is proof, and probably not enough to achieve circumstantial evidence, but it's enough to caution all new investors looking into this stock.

One thing you'll notice about me... I'm consistently inconsistent. I have no loyalties to companies that have screwed me and its shareholders.

And yes, they have screwed you. Don't sugarcoat it, don't argue it. They have screwed you. I don't care if you feel they haven't. The stock would be at five bucks if those financials were released. Now, when they do release them, this stock will suffer from what is commonly known as "Bulletin Board rust", which means that the stock may not take off when those things are released. I've been dabbling in the BB market for over a year now, and I know what happens to stocks when they sit for awhile due to false comments made by an IR firm.

I want NETZ to be a king when it can be a prince? All I want are numbers. And regardless of how "princelike" a company is, they sure as hell can produce facts and figures.

MG Out.



To: Terry T. who wrote (7146)5/20/1998 1:33:00 AM
From: Jon Tara  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18444
 
Well, here's some objective information.

No, I don't have any about the stock - there isn't much of that to be had.

But Terry T suggested that I "have too much time on my hands" and I "need to get a life".

Let's apply an objective test to this assertion, OK? Let's have a little exercise in the disparity between objective information that anybody can verify and claims made by thread participants. It's a trivial and unimportant example, but perhaps this test can tell us something about other "facts" that have been espoused here.

I've adjusted times to each individual's local times, to give some perspective.

These are the times of posts made by myself, Terry T and PartyTime to the NETZ thread over the past two days:

Jon Tara
Pacific time

18'th
------
Morning
6:47AM
7:13AM
8:08AM
8:52AM

Evening
9:06PM

19'th
-----
Morning
6:58AM
8:32AM

Late Evening
11:32PM

8 posts total

Terry T
(unknown time zone, will assume Eastern and correct this later if wrong)

18'th
-----
Morning
9:37AM
10:14AM

Afternoon
2:12PM
3:52PM
5:15PM

Evening
8:50PM
11:20PM

19'th
-----
Late Night
1:49AM
1:52AM
1:53AM

Morning
9:30AM
9:34AM

Late Morning
11:32AM
11:42AM

Afternoon
1:05PM
1:40PM

Late Night
11:50PM

17 posts total

PartyTime
Eastern time zone

18'th
-----
Late Night
2:01AM
2:04AM

Late Morning
10:38AM
11:02AM
11:03AM
11:13AM

Evening
9:48PM
9:59PM
10:22PM
10:39PM

19'th
-----
Morning
9:43AM
10:10AM
10:18AM
10:24AM
10:33AM

Afternoon
12:41PM
1:33PM

17 posts total

======================

Now, I shouldn't need to put this into Excel and draw a chart to illustrate who needs to get a life, and who, in fact, is hanging-out on this thread at all hours.

Certain parties should just drop this subject, as the objective evidence doesn't support their assertions, or at least shows that they are significantly more "guilty" than the accused...