Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (3716)	5/19/1998 8:01:00 AM
From: M. M. Jones	Respond to of 4736

Bob, there you go, jumping to conclusions again. Per has defined the wells. Why don't you find out if they are the same wells NAMX is claiming before you start talking about lies, manipulation and conspiracies? M.M.

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (3716)	5/19/1998 10:32:00 AM
From: Hunter Vann	Respond to of 4736

Documents can be altered, even completely manufactured. So can pictures....

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (3716)	5/19/1998 11:53:00 AM
From: per strandberg	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4736

Bob S, I posed a simple question. I made no allegations. If the old wells are different from the pictured new wells with the same identification, so be it. But if they are the same, then there are a few questions I want to ask. First, 20 years ago, Hoefle Oil in Billings, Montana, sent an application to the Nebraska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission regarding spacing pattern. They stated that they were the owners of the entire oil and gas leasehold estate with regard to the Niobrara Formation in Sections 19,20,21,29,30 in Township 14 North, Range 43 West of the 6th P.M. in Deuel County,Nebraska. They further stated they were the operator with regard to the Porter #1 and Johnson #1 wells situated as I posted. Now will you please verify this for yourself and everybody's sake with Hoefle and the Commission, instead of demanding me to prove the veracity of my quotes, a feat I'm not able to do. However, I am convinced the documents are genuine. Unfortunately I don't have anybody to ask so I ask the thread readers. Q: Has NAMX acquired the leasehold from Hoefle? Is the NAMX 25000 acre lease identical to the Hoefle lease? Q: Did NAMX drill new wells or did they reopen the old ones? (Porter #1,Johnson #1) Q: Indubitably this is not a new field and old drill results were available. Was there an EMsounder scan (as shown in the pictures) of this field? As an investor, I want the real facts. As an investor, so do I. As an investor I want to get to the bottom of the manipulation against NAMX. As an investor I think you have reached your goal. So tell the whole story and let us decide. Members of the jury, the defence rests its case!