Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mohan Marette who wrote (3704)	5/19/1998 9:21:00 AM
From: kormac	Respond to of 9980

Mohan: I used the wrong word as an umbrella for much more complicated motives. My main point, with which you seem to agree, was of course independent of any country. As the saying goes there is no dress rehearsal in life, and history is contingent on events of the past. Sincerely, Seppo

To: Mohan Marette who wrote (3704)	5/19/1998 1:08:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9980

Mohan, <is to dismiss all the legitimate reasons behind the action.> Pray, tell what could these "legitimate" reasons be?

To: Mohan Marette who wrote (3704)	5/19/1998 1:22:00 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9980

I think the tests were good for two reasons: 1) Shows independent resolve on the part of the Indian government to defend its borders. 2) Reminds those who would become complacent about nuclear weapons that the capacity to make them and use them is spreading. These two benefits were accomplished without the shedding of blood. They contribute first to stability of the region and second to a heightened awareness of the growing nuclear 'family' in other parts of the world.