Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sonki who wrote (19547)	5/19/1998 11:19:00 AM
From: billwot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27012

Sonki-Re:LOW/HD On paper, LOW looks like a buy, but that kind of logic convinced me to buy COMS jsut before the USRX deal instead of CSCO, and we all know how that looks in hindsight. (BTW, I am now a very happy CSCO owner). My investment in HD and avoidance of LOW is based purely on Peter Lynch type hands-on observation. LOW is a North Carolina-based company and obviously has a strong presence here, but at least in this area, HD has superior customer service and better inventory. I am an owner of rental properties and a builder, and trade at Lowes only when it is necessary. Most builders and commercial customers that I know agree. Lowes has been a very successful company, however, and has the potential for superior results as they are situated here in this high growth region . billwot