SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (19419)5/19/1998 1:30:00 PM
From: Thure Meyer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
"I am referring to the failed anti-trust action of the 80's. "

Please be more specific and provide some detail.

Thure



To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (19419)5/19/1998 2:15:00 PM
From: Kevin Hay  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 24154
 
There are lots of msft shorts here, right?

I assume all you big talking msft bashers have sizable
short positions, yes? Shoot, you've got big brother on
your side, such a fine alternate to Windows in navigator..
..what could you possibly have to fear?

Those that are short, I at least respect your conviction.
The other bashers obviously have no faith in what they're saying.

IMHO, in the end, it will bo the DOJ fighting to save face.
This is the only thing that will even make this interesting --
watching Janet Reno and co. squirm as they realize they've
been duped. As a msft long. my only concern is that it
takes 7 years for this to happen.

It's getting so bizarre, it's like the Lewinsky story, or OJ or something.
The claims and the quotes that are making the press are so outlandish
that I fear I'll be tuning out the whole thing for a while. Please
remember that the courts definition of a fact is far different than
what is deemed news worthy.

I forecast a massive september quarter for msft due to higher than
expected retail sales of Win98. All this free advertising..., it's so
unfair isn't it? My guess is there's a few months more where you
can get in under 100.

BTW, if this does take years to resolve, we'll all be talking to our
NT machines with dual 800mhz processors, for under $1,000
anyway.

cheers...,
-Kevin



To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (19419)5/19/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: Dermot Burke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
If you are refering to the IBM anti trust action of the 80's .(failed? please read the link!)

Although IBM technically "won" the case when Justice
abandoned its lawsuit in 1982, the cost was devastating. Even
in its early days, "the antitrust case began to color everything
we did," Watson wrote.
From todays Washington Post :http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1998-05/19/138l-051998-idx.html

IBM did not really *win* the case.Reagan's anti trust team just settled a case, which after years of exhausting IBM, did not interst the Great Communicators team of *watcdogs*.