SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jack Be Quick who wrote (21117)5/19/1998 2:15:00 PM
From: celeryroot.com  Respond to of 32384
 
I believe H%Q was in error to begin with.....they just never admitted it. It made no sense to have that estimate on the 132 revenue. If they would lower estimates that much they would downgrade...they did not.



To: Jack Be Quick who wrote (21117)5/19/1998 2:24:00 PM
From: Henry Niman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
Maybe HankH saw a Legg Manson rec and confused H&Q with the mythical firm.



To: Jack Be Quick who wrote (21117)5/19/1998 2:52:00 PM
From: tonyt  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32384
 
You are correct, H&Q lowered their estimate by 73c, not 70c as reported by Hank Hill (never believe a cartoon character)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News