Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: INFOMAN who wrote (1159)	5/19/1998 6:12:00 PM
From: Confluence	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7235

Its great that most people on this thread are early risers, although sometimes Canadians get home from the cottage very late after a weekend. With regard to the mineral rights, is it not the case that mineral rights that are not registered as property of heirs within two years of the holder's death revert to the state? I understood this to be the underpinning of the post '91 exploration and development policies of DME, consistent with section 17, the Green paper and precedent. As this is the heart of the interdict to be heard before the courts (Friday is now the day, according to SUF), we have may have to wait awhile, although I still believe negotiations will eventually settle most issues. Has anyone heard anything from De Beers recently? Perhaps they've commented in RSA, as their people in Vancouver and London are mum? How about the DME? Or anything new from NGS? Confluence