Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DavidA who wrote (1160)	5/19/1998 11:51:00 PM
From: INFOMAN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7235

The fact that SUF managed to to have appropriate discussions with 'existing' holders is exactly my point. Why not expend the same effort and contact the M1 heirs? The heirs were UNAWARE of the existence of these rights and that is why they were not transferred.They are still within SA law and I quote yet again from my first posting:'3. As a result of the manner in which mineral rights were registered prior to 1937, it was impossible for an Executor to do a mineral search if he did not have the description of the property. This is an everyday occurrence and the Deeds Registries Act specifically makes provision for these cases in Section 71 thereof.' Note please that this is an occurrence that is so frequent that it even has a provision made for it.