Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: knight who wrote (13043)	5/20/1998 6:28:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Respond to of 20681

knight, Thank You. Sometimes I almost miss our old buddy HL, but then I talk to Mark and realize there is still plenty of weirdness to deal with ;) Henry

To: knight who wrote (13043)	5/20/1998 8:53:00 AM
From: Tom Frederick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Mr. Knight, you've got a good handle on this I see. I would like to qualify my comments regarding the testing though. It is my opinion that the SFA testing is the smart, prudent and reasonable course to take as that is the best way to establish industry credibility and therefor attract true large scale interest and investment. Having said that, the J/L method or any other method for that matter that CAN get consistent results on COC material in an independent assay lab environment will be very exciting indeed. But that is by no means an assured eventuality. And as such, we need to have a clear understanding that the work being done now is standard, repeatable, believable and the best thing to happen to Naxos to date. Regards, Tom F.

To: knight who wrote (13043)	5/20/1998 10:07:00 AM
From: Jerry in Omaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Mr. knight, <<I know Henry has taken some flack over the last few days from various corners, but believe me everyone, this guy is a real credit to this thread! I can't quite forgive him for HL's demise, but then, nobody's perfect;>> Although Mr. V was an accessory, before and during the fact, he was not totally responsible for the demise of Hungry Lion. The Great White Hunter took Hungry Lion out. See my posting to Mr. V, #reply-2947060. We should give credit, or blame, to the GWH. Thanks for this admission; <<At one time I thought this stock was a scam...>> If you mean by that statement you have concluded no scam then I totally concur. I have known this to be absolutely true since I visited the company in 1996 on a due diligence tour. My knowledge of that fact has been the foundation of my ongoing confidence that this boat someday will float. The derivative of the scam notion first floated by Mr. Meetmer, i.e. Naxos is a scam gone bad, testifies to the depth of the suspicion created by the Canadian press and authorities and a corresponding reluctance to accept the opposite as true; to wit, the company is legit. I am resigned to the fact that only a favorable ASC outcome will reverse any lingering red-flag suspicions and put to rest, finally, these erroneous notions. I would like to thank you, Mr. knight, for the reality anchors you've thrown overboard when needed. Your ongoing contributions are gratefully appreciated. Jerard P