SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: djane who wrote (47189)5/19/1998 9:28:00 PM
From: djane  Respond to of 61433
 
Non-DSL technology is alive and kicking

Excerpt: "With the V.90 standard in place, however, the market for 56K-modem chipsets shows signs of strengthening, Beguwala [Rockwell] said. "We've seen a 100% increase in demand for our chipsets from the beginning of this year."

By Mark LaPedus, May 18, 1998, TechWeb News
techweb.com

Digital Subscriber Line technology has been grabbing a lot of the headlines
lately, but the designers and manufacturers of other broadband architectures
aren't about to roll over and play dead.

In fact, non-xDSL devices such as 56-Kbit/s analog modems, cable
modems, LAN/WAN-based equipment, and wireless systems- driven by the
exploding popularity of the Internet-are expected to experience major growth
over the next several years.

Moreover, new chip technologies could propel non-xDSL equipment well
into the next century. For example, in a move that could prolong the life of the
dial-up modem, chip makers are beginning to integrate 56K-modem and
xDSL-based functions on the same silicon.


At the Networld+Interop '98 show in Las Vegas earlier this month, Lucent
Technologies Inc. introduced the industry's first chipset to provide both
56K-modem and Asymmetric DSL (ADSL) functions on the same chip.
Called WildWire, and expected to be in production by the third quarter,
Lucent's chipset will enable OEMs to provide a new class of high-speed
analog/digital modems. Other chip makers, including Alcatel
Microelectronics, Motorola Inc., Rockwell Semiconductor Systems Corp.,
and Texas Instruments Inc., are reportedly developing similar devices.

Such new developments underscore that it is too early to be declaring a
winner in the broad- band-modem sweepstakes. Some technologies,
however, are being deployed faster than others.

"DSL providers are slowly rolling out their services, but frankly, it's still in the
press release stage," said Patti Reali, an analyst at Data-quest Inc., San Jose.
"So at least until 2000, it's still going to be a dial-up-modem world.
Cable
modems will also have numerous opportunities," she said.

Painful standards war

The U.S. market for 56-Kbit/s analog modems is expected to nearly double,
from less than 14 million units in 1997 to about 25 million or 26 million this
year,
according to Ernie Raper, an analyst at market research firm
VisionQuest 2000 Inc., Moorpark, Calif.

Growth could have been even stronger had there not been a long and
debilitating standards conflict, industry analysts said. In February, however,
the two contending camps finally agreed on a common standard. Called
V.90, it makes the two analog-modem technologies, K56Flex and x2,
interoperable.

"Last year, there was a lot of fear, uncertainty, and doubt about the
56K-modem market [because there was no standard]," said Keith Barber,
data-communications marketing business manager at Dallas-based Texas
Instruments, which supplies x2-based, V.90-compatible chipsets to the
world's largest modem maker, 3Com Corp. "We shipped a lot of chipsets
last year, but we could have shipped more."

Citing disappointing sales of its modem ICs, Rockwell International Corp.
recently reported a 25% drop in fiscal second-quarter profits. "We
experienced slow months in January and February," said Moiz Beguwala,
vice president and general manager of Rockwell Semiconductor's Personal
Computing Division, Newport Beach, Calif. "People did not have time to
react to the new modem standard earlier in the year, and so our customers
were reluctant to buy any chipsets."

With the V.90 standard in place, however, the market for 56K-modem
chipsets shows signs of strengthening, Beguwala said. "We've seen a 100%
increase in demand for our chipsets from the beginning of this year."


Stabilization of the average selling prices for 56K-modem chipsets is another
encouraging sign, according to Craig Garen, general manager of the
modem-IC business at Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, N.J. Until recently,
suppliers of 56K-modem chipsets were slashing their prices to gain market
share, Garen said.

As the business picture brightens, new competitors are entering the
56K-modem market. Motorola recently introduced the MS143455ASK,
which supports ACPI, "Wake-on-Ring," and other functions, said Matt
Nelson, product line manager for analog-modem chipsets, Phoenix.

Later this year, Davicom Semiconductor Inc., a spinoff of Taiwan's United
Microelectronics Corp., will introduce a 56K-modem chipset, said Ting
Herh, president and chief executive of the San Jose-based fabless IC-design
house.

Analog-to-digital migration path

Several companies are focusing their efforts on integrating 56K-modem and
xDSL functions on the same chip.

Lucent's WildWire enables OEMs to build external and internal modems that
support both 56K-analog and 1.5-Mbit/s ADSL data transmissions,
according to Bob Rango, general manager of market development at Lucent's
Microelectronics Group, Allentown, Pa.

WildFire is a three-chip solution consisting of a DSP, ADSL codec, and
analog-modem codec. The chipset supports the new V.90 analog standard,
and the 1.5-Mbit/s rate is roughly the same specification proposed by the
recently created Universal ADSL Working Group. However, that group has
not completed work on the ADSL standard, known as G.Lite, making
WildWire a nonstandard solution for now.

WildWire, however, will include an upgrade path to G.Lite, Rango said. The
chipset will sell for $69 in 10,000s.

Other companies such as Motorola and TI also appear to be planning to use
their DSP cores to develop 56K/ADSL chips. Motorola's current
analog-modem chipsets and its new ADSL chip, CopperGold, are built
around the same DSP core, according to Nelson, who declined to comment
further on the company's plans in this area.

On the cable end

As these developments are unfolding, other chip makers are focusing their
attention on cable modems. After a slow start, the installed base of cable
modems in North America is expected to more than double, from 200,000
units now to 500,000 by year's end, according to Probe Research Inc.,
Cedar Knolls, N.J.

By 2002, 7.1 million cable modems are expected to be installed in North
America and 13.9 million units worldwide, according to Forward Concepts
Co., Tempe, Ariz. By comparison, 1.4 million residential ADSL lines in
North America and 5.7 million ADSL residential lines worldwide are
expected to be installed by 2002, according to the market research firm.

"The tune has changed considerably for cable modems," said Tim
Lindenfelser, vice president of marketing at Broadcom Corp., an Irvine,
Calif.-based supplier of ICs for cable modems, LANs, and xDSL equipment.

"My feeling is that cable modems are far ahead of ADSL. ADSL is still
embroiled in a standards battle, and [ADSL technology] remains expensive,"
he said.

Like 56K modems, cable modems will benefit from a new standard,
MCNS/DOCSIS. The specification, backed by a consortium of
cable-service operators, defines the characteristics of the RF interface, the
message sets, and the signaling sequences between the head-end and
subscriber modems necessary to achieve interoperability.

The cable-modem market also got a boost when another consortium, the
Cable Broadband Forum, was formed recently. The group plans to push for
the use of online services over cable.

Cost remains an issue, however. Standard 56K modems currently sell for less
than $70, while cable modems run as high as $300 to $400, plus about a $30
monthly service fee.


Copyright (c) 1998 CMP Media Inc.

New Search | Search the Web



To: djane who wrote (47189)5/19/1998 9:35:00 PM
From: djane  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
Negroponte says Internet could make cash obsolete

By Stannie Holt
InfoWorld Electric

infoworld.com

Posted at 2:03 PM PT, May 18, 1998
SAN DIEGO -- Internet commerce is a gathering tidal wave that could totally reshape the
world economy within a few years, according to technology pundit Nicholas Negroponte,
director of the Media Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in Boston.

Not only could smart cards replace cash, even for transactions as small as a pack of gum,
computers could turn a handshake into a financial transaction, save books but kill
bookstores, and spare you from ever wondering if you've got milk, Negroponte said.

Negroponte, giving the keynote address Sunday night at the Oracle Applications User Group convention here, scoffed at U.S. government predictions that I-commerce will reach $327 billion per year worldwide by the year 2002. Cisco Systems alone is already doing $3.5 billion per year, he pointed out.

"I think $1 trillion a year by 2000 is modest," Negroponte predicted.


But before I-commerce becomes that extensive, consumers must overcome two barriers,
security and payment systems, Negroponte said.

Security is mostly a regulatory issue, since very strong encryption technology already
exists, Negroponte said. Regulations banning the strongest encryption from being used in
certain countries are "unbelievably silly, because terrorists and drug dealers aren't waiting
for FedEx to deliver a disk to Libya or Colombia."

So, Negroponte reasoned, honest citizens might as well get the same kind of protection,
and buy, sell, and make donations as anonymously online as they can with cash.

Encryption could also help crack the other barrier -- to make transactions as fast and
cheap with credit as with cash -- so that it could become cost-effective to bill a nickel or
dime electronically, Negroponte said.

Microcash transactions "will change consumer behavior enormously," Negroponte said.

For one thing, readers might be more willing to pay for content if they only had to pay a few cents for each article that interested them. [djane notes this will kill me....] Shopping for groceries and other necessities via the Web might also become more common. [and would alleviate the need to ever leave your home...]

I-commerce is already flexing its muscles, Negroponte said. On one hand, it is giving
consumers more power by broadening their choices and letting them band together, for
example, by pooling car purchases to get a fleet discount.

On the other hand, it's killing off such traditional businesses as car dealerships, department
stores, and bookstores, turning them into mere showrooms to tempt online shoppers,
Negroponte said. And it could wipe out jobs for all kinds of middlemen in the retail and
credit industries, such as accountants, data processors, and store clerks.

The future of I-commerce will depend strongly on enterprise IT users such as the Oracle
Applications convention-goers, Negroponte said. In the future, whether they deal in
information or physical goods, "you'd be plumb crazy to put an invoice in the mail and put
on a 32-cent stamp, not to mention a 33-cent stamp," he said.

In a few years, even "walking around money" could become purely virtual, Negroponte
said. The Media Lab at MIT is working on weaving computer circuits into clothing, using
the body's own electrical currents to transmit information. Instead of getting money from an
automated teller machine by sticking a card in and getting printed pieces of paper out, you
could just press your thumbprint to the screen to get the money downloaded to a
computer in your shoe. Conceivably, you could even transfer money through flesh-to-flesh
contact.

"A colleague of mine said it made him think twice about kissing his wife goodbye in the morning," Negroponte quipped.

Negroponte's predictions were provocative for many in the audience.

"Well, I believe accountants will still exist," said accountant Sue Spriggs of construction
services company Landis & Staefa, in Buffalo Grove, Ill. Otherwise, "it was a wonderful
presentation," she added.

"He was really insightful," said Tony Vecchiet, a database administrator at Xilinx, in San
Jose, Calif. "What I thought was a long way off in the future ... a toy, something nobody
takes seriously... he made me think is not so far off."

"I hope he's wrong," said consultant Peter Plackowski in San Francisco. "Would you want to replace the bazaar of Istanbul, so to speak, with staring at a screen? We'd all be in the house and the drug dealers would be running the streets."

On the other hand, some of Negroponte's predictions seem useful, such as being able to
make more kinds of payments electronically, Plackowski added.

"I found it kind of depressing, actually," said Anne Hartheimer, a database administrator at metals manufacturer Oremet-Wah Chang, in Albany, Ore. "It just seemed like there wasn't any connection between human values ... and gadgets. I think there's a lot more to life than computers."

More information on the Oracle Applications User Group can be found at
oaug.org.

Stannie Holt is an editorial assistant t InfoWorld.

Go to the Week's Top News Stories

Please direct your comments to InfoWorld Boston Bureau Chief, Ted Smalley Bowen

Copyright c 1998 InfoWorld Media Group Inc.

InfoWorld Electric is a member of IDG.net



| SiteMap | Search | PageOne | Conferences | Reader/Ad Services |
| Enterprise Careers | Opinions | Test Center | Features |
| Forums | Interviews | InfoWorld Print | InfoQuote |



To: djane who wrote (47189)5/19/1998 9:43:00 PM
From: djane  Respond to of 61433
 
Ethernet turns 25. [Interesting GE vs. ATM debate from an Ethernet perspective]

By Network World staff
Network World, 5/18/98

idgnet.com

In 1973, who knew? Back then, Bob Metcalfe
was just trying to connect a bunch of desktop
computers to a single printer. But his work turned
into Ethernet, the technology that made modern
campus networking practical. In honor of its 25th
anniversary, we recently talked to Metcalfe and
several other networking veterans about where
they see Ethernet heading in the future. They are:

Bob Metcalfe invented Ethernet in 1973
and founded 3Com Corp. in 1979. He is
currently vice president, technology, for
International Data Group, the parent
company of Network World, and a
weekly columnist for NW's sister
publication, InfoWorld.
Vinton Cerf, senior vice president of
Internet architecture and engineering at
MCI Communications Corp.
Bernard Daines knows a little something
about Ethernet. In 1980, he was a
consultant to the team at 3Com Corp. that
produced the first commercial Ethernet
products. In 1992, Daines co-founded
Grand Junction Networks, a Fast Ethernet
switch manufacturer that was sold to Cisco
Systems, Inc. in 1995 for approximately
$350 million. That same year, he founded
Packet Engines, Inc., the Gigabit Ethernet
switch maker. He is currently the
company's chairman of the board,
president and CEO.
Vinod Bhardwaj was co-founder of
Kalpana, Inc., the company credited with
producing the first Ethernet switch - a
switch Bhardwaj designed. He is now
president and CEO of high-speed network
startup ControlNet, Inc.
Eric Cooper is CEO of FORE Systems,
Inc., the premier vendor of ATM switches.
We thought it'd be interesting to get his
perspective on Ethernet because he spends
so much of his time competing against
Ethernet vendors.


Where do you see Ethernet going from
here? Is there a limit to how far the
technology can go, speed-wise?

Metcalfe:
We're at Gigabit Ethernet now, right? There's
clearly work to follow that - it's already going on
in places. I suppose we'll eventually get to Terabit
Ethernet - that's an easy prediction.

Ethernet used to mean CSMA/CD LAN. Now it
means something different. Ethernet is sort of a
name for a cadre of companies that for almost 20
years has learned how to build a series of
businesses based on standards. So that's what
Etherent means - it means that cadre of
companies. It's Ethernet in a much stronger, new
sense. And it's one of the reasons why Gigabit
Ethernet has been kicking ATM's butt recently -
because the ATM people don't know how to
operate this way. We saw it with ISDN, which
was sort of a poor implementation, weakly
standardized, slowly deployed, if at all, and then
overcharged for, without any competition.

And ATM sort of comes out of that [same
group], which doesn't really know how to make
standards, it doesn't know how to migrate - it
doesn't know how to compete, that's probably its
greatest weakness. That would be a systemic
explanation for why Gigabit Ethernet has been
kicking ATM's butt.

Cerf:
The basic design can work beyond gigabits, but
the physical size of the network has to shrink to
make it so. Beyond tens of gigabits, it is hard to
tell whether it will still be useful, except as a very
local interconnect method. Of course switched
Ethernet may well work fine at higher speeds
since only one device occupies each ''spoke,''
and the switching does what the shared Ethernet
did at lower speeds.

Bradner:
Ethernet will continue to get faster - at least on
fiber. Early discussions have started on a 10G
bit/sec Ethernet standard, but I do not expect to
see 10G bit/sec on copper twisted pair anytime
soon.

Cooper:
It's already a stretch to call Ethernet a
''technology.'' Now it's mainly just a logical
specification of address and frame formats. The
early technology - of shared media access,
collision detection and avoidance and so on - has
been made vestigial, if not quite completely
irrelevant, with the advent of switch-based,
dedicated-access networks.

As the historical baggage of shared access is left
behind, there is no technological reason why
Ethernet-compatible address and frame formats
can't be used on higher and higher speed
dedicated links. It's simply gated by
improvements in transceiver technology -
electrical, optical or what have you.

Daines:
No, not really I don't. People are already starting
to talk about 10G bit. The real beautiful thing
about Ethernet over the years has been whenever
something new has come along, Ethernet's been
able to come along to match it.

Bhardwaj:
There is no limit on how far the technology could
go. For fiber, we should see 10G bit/sec Ethernet
soon. And for copper, although the current limit
seems to be at 1G bit/sec on four pairs. With
improvements in cable and by sheer ingenuity of
future creative engineers, it will be possible to
exceed the current 250M bit/sec per pair limit.
Even higher speeds could be obtained by using
more than four pairs in a cable. You could have a
flat cable with 24 pairs running at 10G bit/sec.

What do you see as the key challenges
facing the technology going forward?

Metcalfe:
Getting into the home. In order for ethernet to get
to residential in any big way, just as we saw with
business, a LAN has to develop first because
most of the traffic is LAN traffic and a small
fraction leaks out into the WAN. So a big
challenge is for Ethernet to evolve on the low end
- [to become] cheap and easy to use.

Cerf:
Dealing with higher speeds; possibly
rearchitecting to work in optical mode (with
optical switches and transverse filters).

Bradner:
Other undefined high-speed LANs.

Cooper:
The Ethernet-compatible frame size of 1500
bytes is a brick-wall impediment to high
performance. This is already evident in the Gigabit
Ethernet arena, where vendors must resort to
proprietary - meaning not ethernet - larger frames
to achieve respectable performance.

Ironically, ATM surmounted this challenge years
ago by logically separating the notion of small
fixed-size cells from larger variable-size frames
and using inexpensive silicon to do the
conversion. As a result, FORE's 622M bit/sec
ATM adapter today delivers more than a gigabit
per second of network throughput, in a
completely standards-based way, while the
fastest of the supposedly Gigabit Ethernet
adapters actually deliver less than half that.

Fundamentally, the ethernet standards will have to
encompass larger-than-1500 byte packets in
order to reach new speeds. But that will limit
compatibility with older generations of ethernet.
Eventually, ethernet will have become little more
than a marketing term, like serial interface.


Daines:
That we don't trivialize it. Technology has become
so pervasive and things seem so easy that nobody
questions anything. It'llSo, I guess the answer is,
just don't assume it'll happen by itself; it'll take
work to keep it expanding and growing.

I think in some ways the reason for Ethernet being
so successful over the last few years is there have
been challenges. 100M bit VG was challenging,
so people like [Grand Junction] who were doing
100M bit Ethernet had to work hard to make it
happen and do a good job.

Bhardwaj:
For the copper version, it is the limitations of the
analog circuitry. A special semiconductor process
might be needed just for analog, which could
provide higher speed transistors at higher voltages
and with better substrate noise isolation. I doubt if
the current gigabit standard would work reliably
on the installed base of CAT 5 cable and
connectors with current state-of-the-art in analog
technology.

Will Ethernet have a 50th birthday, or
will it be just a memory by the year
2023?

Metcalfe:
I predicted that 2003 would be the last year in
which a new Ethernet product would be
announced. But I made that prediction based on
the 10M bit/sec limit. That was before I saw, as
others saw, that you could speed it up. That's
been going on steadily. And then when you go
switched and eliminate collisions entirely, the sky's
the limit. I've changed my mind. And I hope to
attend the party. Wouldn't that be nice?

Cerf:
Hard to see that far ahead - it's lasted 25 years
and gone from 3M bit/sec to 1000M bit/sec in
that time. If it can reach terahertz through
switching methods, it could reach 1,000,000M
bit/sec by 2023, maybe sooner.

Bradner:
Just like the person who said: ''I do not know
what the major programming language will be in
the year 2000, but I do know it will be called
COBOL,'' I fully expect that a technology called
Ethernet will be a major player in networks of the
year 2023. But I do not expect that it will be a
CSMA/CD-based technology.

Cooper:
Due to its ubiquity, ethernet will survive as a
marketing term and perhaps as an emulated
compatibility mode supported by the
terabit-per-second, combined cell-and-frame,
all-switched networks of the year 2023.


Daines:
Unless every computer uses teleportation or has
ESP built into them by then, yes, I think Ethernet
will have a 50th birthday. Because, after all, what
is Ethernet today? It's not black cable looping
around computers. It's not even a hub anymore.
Ethernet is a well-understood, well-known
arrangement of data and some rules that go along
with it that is carried using a dozen different media
and signaling types, at four or five different
speeds. The common element is the frame format
and, to some extent, the packet format. No
matter how I transmit my signal from one station
to another, when it gets back into the frame, you
can pass it to another station and [the data] is still
there.

Bhardwaj:
It depends on what we mean by Ethernet.
Ethernet is today full duplex, and that means it is
no longer CSMA/CD technology. It is also no
longer a shared medium with the advent of
switching. So Ethernet will keep on evolving, but
it is quite possible that it is called Ethernet after 50
years even though it will have, in effect, changed
from an ape to a human being.

What were your original expectations
for Ethernet?

Metcalfe:
The immediate problem was to connect all those
new PCs we were building at Parc [Xerox
Corp.'s Palo Alto Research Center] to the laser
printer we were building. I was given the job of
connecting them together. It was the beauty of the
mathematics of Ethernet that appealed to me. It's
simplicity and elegance at its core. So one of my
expectations was to pursue a design based on an
elegant mathematical forumation and another one
was to hook up those soon-to-be called PCs to
that soon-to-be-called laser printer, so that it
worked, so I could print out documents at very
high speed.

The idea of Ethernet as a standard did not occur
until '79, six years later. It was an idea that
Gordon Bell at [Digital Equipment Corp.] and I
had at a meeting in his office at DEC in February
of '79. He wanted me to devise another LAN that
DEC could use that wouldn't run afoul of Xerox's
patents. And we had the idea, ''Hey, instead of
doing all that, why don't we just write a letter to
Xerox and propose we work together to make a
standard?'' And then it began to look big so that
by June, after I brought DEC, Intel and Xerox
together, I was convinced there would be an
Ethernet-compatible marketplace and that 3Com
should be formed to serve it. So it looked big
then, in '79, not back in '73 when it was invented
- May 22, 1973.

Cerf:
A great and cheap way to interconnect a lot of
computers.

What has most surprised you about the
evolution of Ethernet?

Metcalfe:
Other than the fact that it passed 100 million
connections a long time ago? Other than the fact
that 3Com is now a $7 billion company? Those
are two big surprises.

I'm surprised about how ugly the process is of
standardizing and competing around a standard.
It's intrinsically ugly, and it works beautifully. But
you have to have a stomach for street fighting.
That was kind of a surprise. Innovation is not
some artist's conception of innovation. It's really
rough and tumble and that's necessary for it to
work, and it does work brilliantly. Evidence -
Gigabit Ethernet kicking ATM's butt.

Cerf:
Its ability to adapt to higher speeds (through) the
switched versions.

Bradner:
The level of assumption by others (first token-ring
proponents, then ATM proponents) that Ethernet
was a has-been inferior technology and would
soon fade to nothing.

Daines:
The biggest surprise I had was at Grand Junction
when we were working on a [100M bit/sec
Ethernet network interface card] that would start
selling at about $1,500, which is about what the
FDDI ones were. And I made the real bold
prediction that within a few years, we'd get our
NIC down to about $250 to $295. Look how
wrong I was. It's now $29 or $39 for a 100M bit
NIC. I can hardly believe it.

Feedback | Network World, Inc. | Sponsor
Index
Marketplace Index | How to Advertise |
Copyright

Home | NetFlash | This Week | Industry/Stocks
Buyer's Guides/Tests | Net Resources | Opinions |
Careers
Seminars & Events | Product Demos/Info
Audio Primers | IntraNet