Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (10738)	5/19/1998 10:24:00 PM
From: dougjn	Respond to of 152472

572 wordies, you piker, to be precise. <<But it will hit criticality with handset costs and quality, coverage and per minute pricing probably next year. Then it will take off very fast. It will depend on analog conversions mostly [I guess]. Analoguers will change with a rush when they do.>> Precisely. Perhaps you will consider a major diversification move, and look at this one when its offered, like me. It may have the added advantage of debuting as a spinoff, which are nearly always undervalued (in the US markets of today) at birth. Didn't sell Gstrf at 72, but did sell Lor a tad under 33. And bought some 2001 leaps today when Lor was at 25.5. <ggg> I don't understand biotech and know that many others do (though not most biotech investors who are utter sheep, I think.). Hense no Techniclone, or even examination of same. I keep having this nagging instinctual voice welling up inside me, however, saying that Entremed just may be the real deal. Never felt that way about any other biomed. If it corrects enough I just may listen to myself. How's the late fall treating you down under? Does it get seriously chilly where you are, or is it Med / San Francisco type weather? Doug

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (10738)	5/20/1998 1:45:00 PM
From: Asterisk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Maurice: If you think that the american public will vote for "Mr Excitement" Al Gore then you either haven't seen any of his speeches or you really have a low opinion of americans. If you look at most of the american presidents of the 20th century they have been fairly dynamic people. There are of course exceptions like Ford and Carter, but for the most part the thesis holds. Al Gore really has no chance of being elected because he is soooo boring. I don't know about others but I really want someone who is dynamic representing america.