SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sam Ferguson who wrote (15994)5/20/1998 11:27:00 AM
From: gregor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39621
 
Dear Sam:>>>>>>>My name is not Ann but nobody needs an interceder. Since God is omnipresent according to all sense & reason, Prayer to God is simple and direct. As to the effect or efficacy there is no way to test whether mass has any further influence.

If you take away the intermediary man Jesus you will find the Christ that lives in your heart and mind.. That is why I bitterly fight this fabricated word of God.
<<<<<<<<<

No personal attacks here. In a sense I admire any person that bitterly fights for what they believe in, even if it is contrary to what I believe in. Also , I have read some of your posts; you are a very erudite individual, so I'll attempt to respond on a level you can appreciate.

When is an intermediary more of a necessity, when an innocent person has been charged or when a guilty party is charged?

Is an intermediary more of a necessity in an honest, fair court or a crooked court with a crooked judge ?

Is an intermediary more of a necessity when the prosecutor is honest or when the prosecutor is crooked ?

Is an intermediary needed more when the prosecutor likes or hates the defense attorney?

Is an intermediary more of a necessity when the prosecutor truly believes the person charged is innocent or guilty.

Is an intermediary needed more when the facts surrounding the case point to a greater scale and the individual becomes the pawn of larger forces at work. I could go on; but I'll stop here. To get to some answers. ( Don't lose interest** stay with me, I promise I'll hear you out in return ).

In reverse. Mankind has become the pawn in a grand scale battle between heaven and the fallen angels.

Satan believes mankind is guilty as "hell"( that kind of felt good to say that, since I got away with saying it in context ).He was punished, why shouldn't we be punished.

Satan, being the "ex-disgruntled employee--(what greater wrath is known to mankind, I've run my own business for years and have witnessed this), hates Christ with all his heart--believe me when I say it is a PERSONAL THING between Christ and satan. For that reason the issue transends the individual charged or the offense, actually the offenses become almost unimportant.

Satan. No honest prosecutor. A liar of epic proportions. Fabricator. Great imagination.

Fair court. Think about it. Intermediary needed more in fair court. Why. Because guilty party will be punished. Crooked judge. Lets a lot of his buddies off. Takes bribes, payoffs. Lets a lot of guilty go.

Are we all guilty of sin. Yes. are we guilty .Yes. Do we need a good lawyer. Oh yes.

You have a great day. Thank you for your response. I do love you in Christ.. gregor