Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas Haegin who wrote (3738)	5/20/1998 10:18:00 AM
From: Stitch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9980

Thomas, I think that the world would be much better off without massively destructive weapons. But to say that if one has it, all should is going a bit off the deep end. Would you include Libya for example? Or, anyone remember Ghadaafi's buddy Idi Amin? I would say fewer is better then all inasmuch as its already a fact of life. Anything to decrease the chances of actual usage IMO is better. best, Stitch

To: Thomas Haegin who wrote (3738)	5/20/1998 11:02:00 AM
From: Real Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9980

On the other hand, the world has lived over 50 years without a major war. I think the bomb is responsible for that. Nothing will destroy the fear of the bomb now. Take it away - the technology will be left. -Vi