Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: per strandberg who wrote (3741)	5/20/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: Hunter Vann	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4736

impression of the first two wells being successful wildcat wells. Yes, they did. Could be the reason why most of them were taken down. Here's my impression of the whole saga... Stamm & company did an aerial flyover of the Nebraska land using the Em-Sounder technology. They sent this data to Geophysiks for analysis. Based upon this data, they then in turned decided to drill on specific sites in Nebraska based upon the findings of the Em-Sounder technology. It's now apparent that the Nebraska area was already a proven gas enriched field. Hell, they've simply reworked one of the wells that was drilled in 1978. Was this the well that Geophysiks did the analysis on? Predicting flow rates, etc..etc..? Also, whatever happened to the clarification of the Gruy report?