Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Enigma who wrote (11950)	5/20/1998 12:36:00 PM
From: posthumousone	Respond to of 116820

re: bankruptcy......do people that declare keep everything that bought????? It seems to be the in thing to do ...there is no shame anymore

To: Enigma who wrote (11950)	5/20/1998 12:50:00 PM
From: Ahda	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116820

not sure quite what you want here are three i have. contingencyanalysis.com pathfinder.com:80/time/magazine/1998/dom/980525/asias_crisis.the_banks_n8.html troweprice.com

To: Enigma who wrote (11950)	5/23/1998 12:03:00 PM
From: William JH	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116820

Thanks for answering my question about credit card defaults. Another question. According to a summary from "Mining Engineering" written by a man who works for a mineral economics consulting firm, (posted on YAHOO ECO board, #635), the cost of production of gold by mining companies is greatly understated, perhaps as much as $100 per ounce. This makes sense to me, since I can't find any E in the PE of gold mining stocks, even those who have sold forward at higher prices. If the costs actually are much higher, wouldn't it be much better to own the physical gold, or futures contracts, than to buy the mining stocks? Thanks and best regards,