Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (19537)	5/20/1998 4:54:00 PM
From: Thure Meyer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

"socio-economic" reference Sociology, fifth edition - by Kammeyer, Ritzer " Ah, a reference at last. Naturally I will look this up in your reference. In particular the term "socio-economic majority" which I am sure is discussed in great detail. As to the term socio-biology I am more than familiar with the term (Wilson, et.al) and the controversy surrounding it. When I quote from your reference, don't get upset. Thure

To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (19537)	5/21/1998 3:16:00 AM
From: Charles Hughes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

>>>Again, just because you are not aware of a term, it doesn't exist. I am sure there are a plethora of words that you never heard of. Does that make them non-existant? For more on the term "socio-economic" Nice try but no dice Reggie. You used the phrase 'socio-economic majority' and it is that phrase in toto that is at issue and no other. Find us the reference where someone respectable defined the term 'socio-economic majority' or quiet down about it, for cryin' out loud. You're busted, dude. :-) Chaz