SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Roger's 1998 Short Picks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JEFF CHAPMAN who wrote (9024)5/20/1998 8:29:00 PM
From: George Acton  Respond to of 18691
 
NEOT looks a lot like ENMD, but beware. ENMD went up by a factor
of 6 or 7 and this one has only doubled. ENMD was based on old
results in mice, amplified by a NYT article; the NEOT results
look newer and already have a promising or completed Phase I.
Volkman has been working on angiogenesis for 25 years, but the
story on NEOT is more novel (using a small molecule to stimulate
the production of big protein molecules that can't be given
directly). There are enough differences to suggest that NEOT
may take a little longer to go through the cycle that ENMD
did. Confirmation may take 1-2 years at least, so some pullbacks
are almost certain. But this doesn't look like the slow, easy
one right over the plate that ENMD was. (I'm still annoyed with
Schwab for not having borrowable shares on that one.)

--George Acton



To: JEFF CHAPMAN who wrote (9024)5/20/1998 9:30:00 PM
From: tcarnes  Respond to of 18691
 
dear jeff thanks will follow in the am. tj