Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (6259)	5/21/1998 12:49:00 AM
From: Kevin K. Spurway	Respond to of 6843

Elmer, I think what Petz would like to see is Intel license the chipsets to more than one vendor. Kevin

To: Elmer who wrote (6259)	5/21/1998 10:23:00 AM
From: Kenith Lee	Respond to of 6843

Petz sometimes I just can't believe the tortured logic you guys come up with. First Intel is guilty of monopolistic practices for not licensing Slot1, and now they are guilty of monopolistic practices when the do license it. Intel just can't do anything right by your reasoning. Damned if they do, damned if they don't. Elmer, Intel really don't want to license this until it is necessary. It is hoping (praying) FTC will forgive all the evil things it has done. It is like people do not believe in God until he is laying on the hospital bed. Just my opinion.