Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Hughes who wrote (19573)	5/21/1998 4:06:00 AM
From: nommedeguerre	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

Chaz, >>I'm afraid I have to disagree on this one. You could face all the passengers to the rear and all the passengers would still die when the plane failed. If you are considering only the spectacular crashes but there are lots of injuries caused on the taxi-ways, etc. which are too boring to perk the media. Many accidents still occur during take-off and landing due to wind-shear in which parachutes and improved glide are meaningless. Dropping like a rock to the ground is the biggest problem. You are right that there are probably some things that could be improved but most of the money goes into prevention at this point. My friend's dad was a pilot for Pan Am and said he still preferred the odds on a 747 to that of Vietnam where he had a 1-14% chance of being shot down. Cheers, Norm