Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Famularo who wrote (5150)	5/21/1998 11:57:00 AM
From: Blue	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7966

Frank, check the screen size. Monopros using 1mm square, Ashton using .5 mm square I believe. Also, since the 5034 pipe has already been given an accurate per carat valuation, the adjacent Tuzo pipe is likely worth the same and this is confirmed by this sample. Also note the preponderance of large stones in both pipes. Tuzo sample had 10 stones 0.8 carat or larger, 2 of these being 1.8 and 2.3 carats. Obviously the stones need to be proven gem quality and it looks like MPV's pipes have the right chemistry. Maybe ACA's do but we are still waiting to hear on that. A per carat valuation would provide a real leg up. Just some thoughts.