Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Stock Swap -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew Vance who wrote (14007)	5/21/1998 12:54:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17305

A record? Like a 78 RPM? But a 78 MM is not a gun, I don't think. More like a cannon. Fiddling around with options again, eh? You really are showing your age. As people get older, they start writing those calls. Well, next time I'm in the auld country I'll bring ye back a blackthorn (cane) to help you get about.

To: Andrew Vance who wrote (14007)	5/21/1998 12:56:00 PM
From: Andrew Vance	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17305

AV--ASYT has traded close to 2X average daily volume with no appreciable change in its price. I like this since it may be the start of finding a new base from which to springboard from. This is not a widely traded stock (in the millions) and has a low enough float to make it easily manipulated. For this reason it is more speculative than most. However, it will not take much interest to push this stock up. That interest is coming from 2 directions. First, there ares ome of yesterday's analysts coming out with some favorable stuff on ASYT and one of them even had a $58 target. Second, I had the occasion (unfortunate occasion) to be speaking with yet 2 more "boiler room" operations this morning. The stocks they wanted me to get involved in were ICGN and JENN (second call on JENN) but after I listened and then read them the "riot act" on ASYT, both of them were salivating. I wonder if I "reverse boiler roomed" them. How would that be<GGG>. Andrew