Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Roger's 1998 Short Picks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (9078)	5/21/1998 3:10:00 PM
From: craig crawford	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18691

<< Who said they should have "unfairly attacked Dell"? >> It sounds like you wouldn't be happy unless they did. Why don't you offer an example of what Haines, Faber, Cramer, or Kernan should have asked DELL. << On CNBC, to the best of my recollection, he put all the blame on shorts "painting the tape" on Instinet >> He did talk alot about the instinet part (the most interesting part in my mind) and also mentioned profit-taking as well. What else can you say about profit taking? Profit taking is profit taking and doesn't need to be discussed. Instinet was an interesting topic (brought up by Haines, not Cramer), so it deserved more air time. << as I noted yesterday, there were several large blocks crossing at the lower prices on Instinet. >> Ne noted the exact opposite, that there was no real volume to the downside. << If you want to help me understand how Dell is >> Huh? I'm not trying to froce my views on anyone, I am just stating them forcefully so people can't claim that I didn't stake my ground. I am a DELL believer and I am not afraid to admit it. << How do they do it? >> If I knew how I wouldn't be sitting here tapping my computer, I would be on CNBC talking about my 55% growth rate over the last 5 years.