Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tiquer who wrote (19654)	5/21/1998 11:50:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

That's a good story, Roger. I'm jealous, I usually don't check infoworld till the end of the week. I recall it being pretty obvious as the ISP deals were going down that IE was more that "free forever", it had a negative cost, that is, people were being paid to take it. A few other choice snippets (from infoworld.com ) For instance, without identifying the author, the Justice Department filing quotes an internal Microsoft document as saying that the "strategic objective" was to "kill cross-platform Java by grow[ing] the polluted Java market." Not exactly a surprise there, just an old favorite topic. Ballmer's "Embrace and Demolish" on the Java front. According to the Justice Department, Windows marketing director Jonathan Roberts told his subordinates to "to really look at why people who get IE with a new machine switch to Navigator and what is being addressed in IE 4.0 to make that difficult." Good old Microsoft, always looking to give the customers what they want. Just taking us where we want to go again. The memos also detail Microsoft's determination in keeping OEMs from removing the Internet Explorer icon from the Windows desktop. Several PC makers, including Micron, Compaq, and Gateway, butted heads with the Redmond, Wash., giant over the issue -- and lost. That being to preserve the integrity and uniformity of the Windows 95 experience, of course. Which suddenly became an issue when that air supply thing became important. I wonder if all this stuff was around because of Exchange's "rich messaging architecture", aka email in a database. Almost enough to make you feel sorry for these guys, sort of like the Nixon tapes. Then again, it couldn't happen to a nicer company. Cheers, Dan.

To: tiquer who wrote (19654)	5/22/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: Keith Hankin	Respond to of 24154

In a memo dated July 1996, Gates allegedly described to other executives his efforts to persuade Intuit CEO Scott Cook to move his company from Navigator to Internet Explorer: "I was quite frank with him ... that if he had a favor we could do for him that would cost us something like $1M to do that in return for switching browsers in the next few months I would be open to doing that." My question for you legal experts out there is: Is this illegal? My suspicions are that it may be. Deals are cut all the time. However, could this be considered a form of dumping or bribe that is not legal for a monopoly to do?