Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DavidA who wrote (1190)	5/22/1998 1:25:00 AM
From: GULL	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7235

So now it was a 'wise' move for SUF to fold at court. I would like you to read through your own postings and then explain yourself. To assist you , I have quoted from your previous posting on the eve of the court case: 'P.S. This reminds of the movie "Sting" however in this event NGS are still to be stung, with the implementation of section 17...' At the time I told you about the version which I had seen , I wonder who saw the "Sting"? SUF dropped the Section 17. I happened to be at court and am not speculating. What is CJ swinging?