To: Robert Pool who wrote (4181 ) 5/22/1998 4:29:00 PM From: Tom G Respond to of 6467
Repost from Yahoo FRom TT lawyer Part I Exact copy of FAX received at 20:29 last night. Call (604)534-5085 to get a copy. "As you know, today was the court appearance before Justice Cohen on Trooper's motion for contempt sanctions. The Judge ruled initially that Rene would be excluded from consideration for contempt sanctions, and that the hearing would proceed only against TTRIF and TTWSI. There was a full day of testimony, with David Lunny cross-examining Dr. Cumming & Ross Lewis for Trooper; Ed Bowes on our behalf cross-examined Stan Lis and his engineer, Harlan Kelly. We had an excellent day, with the following high points: Dr Cumming testified to & demonstrated the conscientious response of TTRIF to Justice Cohen'sOrder, having studied it in light of the Reasons for Judgement, noting that we hired Ross Lewis of Stothart engineering to review the License Agreement, the order, and the Design Criteria Manual to be certain that we were in full compliance with the order, and that Trooper had the latest improvements available under the License Agreement. Dan covered the old patents, resisting adeptly Lunny's attempts to suggest that we had merely improvements, not unique new subject areas, in our new patented processes. Ross Lewis testified that he had reviewed Justice Cohen's Order, and found that Cohen had expressly excluded from production specifications related to equipment and construction, and environmental studies. So Ross therefore believed that the order only called for turning over the technology Transfer Manual, which is our Design Criteria Manual, which he updated, after due diligence, in full compliance with the Order. Lunny appeared totally taken aback by Ross' reliance on what Cohen had excluded from production, and attacked Ross only to the extent of urging that the standard engineering drawings which Ross produced had not been certified. Ross produced a copy of the certification from his file. Ross stressed the difference between process drawings - which the Design Criteria Manual provided - and construction drawings, which could be produced by reference to a specific locale, from our Manual. He pointed out too that in 1992, there had been no plants built; none were built until 1994. Ross stressed that we had produced all of the certified standard engineering drawings which we possessed, and that in his professional opinion: i) TTRIF had complied fully and in good faith with the Order; ii) Trooper has everything in the Design Criteria Manual necessary to build plants; and iii) that he was familiar with dick Engineering's drawings, and that these were for a wholly different process and had nothing to do with what was acquired by Trooper under the License Agreement. On cross-examination, Stan Lis stated that all of Trooper's press releases were true, including those from early 1997 that reported a contract with Korbud in Poland to do all of their necessary plant drawings, and that all approvals had been obtained from evey agency except one so that construction was definitely to start in August, 1997. Against this, he tried to claim that he had gotten all of this permitting done without producing any drawings, (that Korbud had been hired to do under the "Contract"), and all of this was because TTRIF didn't get him "blueprints". He claimed that all of his filings & permits in Poland were achieved without having to file a single drawing, because he had none and this was our fault. Ed Bowes demonstrated that the BDO report, and Trooper's own "true" press releases, said the opposite. Lis claimed that his website report that environmental approved deals had been obtained based on the specificeions from the Ontario plants was false.