Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Angel D who wrote (47267)	5/22/1998 7:21:00 AM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Has anyone called the transfer agent recently to see if they can get any info about these trades?//DD off to work

To: Angel D who wrote (47267)	5/22/1998 8:00:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

ad, i don't have great insight. this is easy. when company officials are talking about investors having an issue with shorters... whoah... anyway, the admitted shortseller had 100k as reported. to me, 100k shares is a non issue. i've never seen another number publish. anywhere. that 100k was months ago. it could be more or less now. roll the dice...

To: Angel D who wrote (47267)	5/22/1998 9:22:00 AM
From: s martin	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 55532

Angel, I'm sure if you put your mind to it you will figure it out, if not read the thread from that time frame. Mork's people were trying to show the investors that the BS on this thread was just that, BS. While Riley was trying to convince everyone that they were buying stock in a dynamic , legitimate, revenue producing company, Mork was proving that these were serious misrepresentations and that they were being lied to. In the final analysis it was Mork not Riley who provided the most accurate information, right?