Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry L who wrote (28)	5/22/1998 3:58:00 PM
From: Dragonfly	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 880

Nothing will ever be proven as long as: 1. It is up to Janet Reno (who, by the way was hired by and works for Clinton) to send some of the allegations to an independent counsil for proper investigation. There is already an independant council. Maybe you've heard of Kenneth Starr. He's got free reign to investigate Clinton and he has run all over the place, paying no attention to the charges he's supposed to be investigating, attempting to dig up dirt, with no success. Janet Reno is not obstructing justice, as you unfairly assert-- that's the whole reason for the independant council law. 2. Justices, who by their nature are liberal and many of whom have been appointed by democrats, The fact is that most of the sitting federal justices were appointed by Reagan. Sorry. Dragonfly