Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (753)	5/23/1998 12:19:00 AM
From: The Perfect Hedge	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

Suzie- First of all in adding up revenues for TSIG and implying a double digit stock price,you forgot about TSIG's teleservice biz.... secondly,why are you already talking about a double digit stock price? GD

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (753)	5/23/1998 1:27:00 AM
From: Mister_Ex	Respond to of 44908

Suzanne, Thanks very much for your detailed post. It is much appreciated. Mister Ex

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (753)	5/23/1998 2:06:00 AM
From: Martin E. Frankel	Respond to of 44908

Suzanne, Excellent post! << 39 million shares outstanding. The company will not divulge its plans regarding future stock issuings. The key point is whether issuing more stock brings in greater earnings per share (i.e. is the activity for which the stock was issued accretive or dilutive). >> Based upon their current activities (as are known), they would appear to be accretive. Gordon taking additional stock for his significant financial support of TSIG is, IMHO, justified. Anyone else (such as us) willing to "gamble" that kind of investment in their own Company, without confidence that they would have a decent return on their investment? The CC deal was certainly, IMO, accretive. Options given to management and employees, if realistic, are a great incentive and certainly accretive. If excessive internal (directly or indirectly) stock issuance occurred resulting in dilution and decreased EPS, all stockholders... including the insiders and management would be hurt... plus they might open themselves up to a stockholders' class action suit. Gordon impresses me as being too sharp for that. From what I can read on this whole matter, your questions are quite legitimate. Best regards, Marty