Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry T. who wrote (7397)	5/23/1998 7:58:00 AM
From: Brady B.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

I HAVEN'T SEEN THIS QUESTION ASKED OR ANSWERED YET. Why did they change the trading symbol to zulu if they plan to use the esvs symbol to get on the board? If they do merge can they transfer all the rights and privileges provided by the esvs symbol to the zulu symbol? Thus retiring the esvs symbol and operating entirely under the zulu symbol. bb

To: Terry T. who wrote (7397)	5/23/1998 10:33:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

>>>Gee whiz, Jon, I'm trying to review past, substantive posts, and its seems you are up to about 999 negative comments to -0- positive ones. I am sure this is just a "typo" on your part, or you forgot you were the champion of impartiality, or you just forgot you were leaning a little bit one way, and you can point me to a thread where you have made a positive statement or comment about the prospects for a stock. Not that there is anything wrong with being a sorry sack of you know what, of course (LOL, LOL).<<< Terry, I thought you knew his history on this thread. He's appeared, day and night, right after Wired came out with its slime journalism. We've had him down NETZ/ZULU/ESVS ever since. I'll leave the irony of this for him to describe. After all, I don't want him to receive too many apologies from me. I don't like being negative on him--or anyone, for that matter--but sometimes it's a necessity. What I find most ironic is that you come into a stock discussion thread in order to defend erroneous remarks made about the stock in which you've invested. After a while, in the course of your defense, you get labeled a "hypster." Ha! Since when is sharing positive opinion a form of hyping? The irony is, because of the likes of Jon, Other Chap and others, it becomes difficult for people who are positive on the stock to share negative criticisms because all that space gets taken by those who throw mud instead of objectively criticize.