SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (13110)5/24/1998 4:35:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
Henry, although we have differences in investing philosophy, we have a lot more in common than not.

I doubt it. I don't know enough about you to be sure and you certainly don't know enough about me.

In your post Message 4559232
you say that money is to be made on speculation not in the creation of a mine. This is a valid investment approach and I don't criticize you for employing it. But it is definitely not my approach. I am not investing in Naxos for speculative frenzy but for the creation of a viable mine.

You have repeatedly asserted that you believe Naxos is a desert dirt and you are investing in it for that reason. I have stated on numerous occasions that I believe Naxos is pursuing a conventional process and will succeed. I have stated the reasons I believe this and you have sneeringly stated I was long winded. I respectfully asked you for the reason you believed in the theories supporting the desert dirt phenomenon and you remained silent. I am not interested in belief without reasons.

You purchased Naxos because you believe it will succeed as a desert dirt. I have stated I would sell Naxos if it was only pursuing a desert dirt strategy.

You state that we have a lot in common. I suspect your reasons for this belief are as questionable as the reasons for your belief in desert dirts. If anyone else had said that you and I had a lot in common I would have been insulted.

Henry