Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Colvin who wrote (19045)	5/23/1998 4:38:00 PM
From: art	Respond to of 27968

I think we are missing the point of freddie's letter. IMO it's okay. But the more you use that acronym and the more people see it the more creditability you give to the statement. It was like the r/s everyone jumped on the band wagon and it took weeks to dispel that rumor. I guess when people come over this thread I want to see positive posts with accountability from posters and looking for ways to increase share holder value with out making it look like we are at each others throats. Art

To: David Colvin who wrote (19045)	5/23/1998 4:45:00 PM
From: Freddie Forte	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Will everyone just chill out. The sec is not going to halt Famh. One more time, I asked them to examine the company. If nothing is wrong, business as usual. If something is wrong, then, yes, I would like to know. Why is everyone so scared ?? Hey Dave, WE ALL have a lot of money invested here. I'm trying to protect mine. If you feel my actions are a detriment to your investment, so be it. I chose to find some answers out. 3 months of false press releases and lying will do that to you.

To: David Colvin who wrote (19045)	5/23/1998 4:51:00 PM
From: Freddie Forte	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

Rmil and Famh are VERY different. Famh is a real company and Rmil was a scam. What's your point ?

To: David Colvin who wrote (19045)	5/24/1998 11:24:00 AM
From: Lurker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27968

<<The SEC HALTED trading on RMIL because of complaints to the SEC. Is that what you want? How do you think legitimate long shareholders here would feel if the SEC halted trading because you sent the SEC a letter...huh?>> Why would this be so bad? It may be bad for the daytraders, like Pugs, Mel, etc. However, I don't give a damn about them. All they want is a spike so that they can make a quick buck. They don't care if we long shareholders get screwed by bad management. I would like to see long term growth in this company. Who knows, this may be a $5.00+ company some day. A 3-6 month halt on trading wouldn't bother me at all. I still have a few years left before I need to pull my money out of this stock. Lurker