Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (3088)	5/24/1998 1:31:00 AM
From: Andrew H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

>> My question to him (and I am no expert in these matters at all) is related to his statement that Guido needs to move 200 million tons to prove 6 million oz; as it relates to the fact that we KNOW Guido did not indeed move 200 million tons. Perhaps Claude meant to say that he would feel more confident if they had tested 200 million tons. I am sure we all would be! But he said that you HAVE to test that much (more or less). That statement, IMO, slams a few doors. Claude seems to have spent some serious time on this highly-technical matter. Thus I hope he will expand on his prior post.<< I get it now--good point. I hope he will expand as well! Claude?

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (3088)	5/24/1998 1:46:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

<< My question to him (and I am no expert in these matters at all) is related to his statement that Guido needs to move 200 million tons to prove 6 million oz; as it relates to the fact that we KNOW Guido did not indeed move 200 million tons. >> Reads my post again. I didn't say that. I was giving exemple. It could be 30M tons or 10M tons that needed to be sampled to prove up the reserves...I don't know since we don't have info on the grade.