SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (32383)5/24/1998 9:05:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Richard, the difference is that in both cases you cite, I have never said "if you ar not long you are wrong", as a matter of fact, anyone that listened to me on both of these (AKSEF and EXSO) and got out when I said you should no longer be long, would have done quite fine. Even Aksef, in which I have turned bullish just recently (on the first break to under $1.5,) I said quite clearly that the break was not a typical volume price reversal and the stock would likely drift back down to retest the lows. As a matter of fact there is no stock in which I am permanently bullish or bearish. Things changes and I change with them. Take GPGI, I was a bull on it, but since the last run to 2.5 (a long time ago) I am still on the sidelines and continue to say so.

Furthermore, when my view and others are not congruent, I do not resort to foul and denigrating language to further my view point. I most often bring an argument, either a technical or a fundamental one to support my views. We are all going to be wrong often enough, but if we use these threads to get at each other throat, we cannot benefit from our intellectual exchanges since we will be busy in an eternal fight of verbal pugilism. I still maintain that CL did a great disservice to a great majority of readers on this thread, and owes the thread a humble apology. The fact are quite simple.

Zeev