Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon who wrote (3108)	5/24/1998 11:47:00 AM
From: SOROS	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

*TAKE A BREAK* WHAT IF MICROSOFT BUILT CARS Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you'd have to buy a new car. Occasionally your car would just die on the motorway for no known reason. You'd just accept this, restart and drive on. Occasionally, executing a maneuver would cause your car to stop and fail to restart and you'd have to re-install the engine. For some strange reason, you'd just accept this, too. You could only have one person in the car at a time, unless you bought a "Car 95" or a "Car NT." But then you'd have to buy a bigger engine. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was twice as reliable, just as fast, twice as easy to drive-but it would only run on 5% of the roads. The Macintosh car owners would get expensive Microsoft upgrades to their cars which would make their cars go much slower. The oil, engine, gas and alternator warning lights would be replaced with a single "General Car Fault" warning light. People would get excited about the "new" features in Microsoft cars, forgetting completely that they had been available in other cars for many years. We'd all have to switch to Microsoft gas and all auto fluids, but the packaging would be superb. New seats would force everyone to have the same size "behind." The airbag system would say, "Are you sure?" before going off. If you were involved in a crash, you would have no idea what happened. They wouldn't build their own engines, but would form a cartel with their engine suppliers. The latest engine would have 16 cylinders, multi-point fuel injection and four turbos, but it would be a side-valve design so you could use Model-T Ford parts on it. There would be an "Engium Pro" with bigger turbos, but it would be slower on most existing roads. Microsoft cars would have a special radio/cassette player which would only be able to listen to Microsoft FM, and play Microsoft Cassettes-unless, of course, you buy the upgrade to use existing stuff. Microsoft would do so well, because even though they don't own any roads, all of the road manufacturers would give away Microsoft cars free, including IBM! If you still ran old versions of Car (i.e. CarDOS 6.22 / CarWIN 3.11), then you would be called old fashioned, but you would be able to drive much faster, and on more roads! If you couldn't afford to buy a new car, then you could just borrow your friends, and then copy it. Whenever you bought a car, you would have to reorganize the ignition for a few days before it would work. You would need to buy an upgrade to run cars on a motorway next to each other.

To: Jon who wrote (3108)	5/24/1998 12:08:00 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

<<Proving up 6 millions ounces of .03 grade means drilling, trenching and sampling through 200 millions tons where proving up 6 millions ounces of 1.5 opt gold means drilling and sampling only 4 millions tons of material.>> Claude was definitely speaking about what is required to prove (not extract) the reserves. We have asked him to expand on and clarify his opinion so those of us with less knowledge in these matters can better understand. It seems to me that moving and testing 200 million tons before any production would make finding gold anywhere prohibitively expensive.