Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Zalkind who wrote (5072)	5/24/1998 1:16:00 PM
From: K A Anderson	Respond to of 6654

Paul Lets review in November CVIA had 50,000,000 outstanding and a book of around $1,000,000 or .05. Dont believe me? then how did Jack raise $1,500,000? It wasnt a worthless high risk shell like some like to present it. Most clean fully complaint SEC shells have near that value. Now the book value is almost incalculable after Jacks, financial wizadry. We supported CVIA until April 14, and the price never rose over .025, so all that support only took the stock that high. So now our discontent has it near .01? or was it the Aprl 14, announcement of 300 to 1 reverse split that did it? and who did that PR us share holders or Jack Arnold? A shell is supposed to be acquired by a private company, Jack now has all this A$$ backwards, he is buying a private company? Then we didnt invest in an empty shell after all. So thats our fault too? So the new investors arent flocking to CVIA why? Because the current shareholders are voicing their discontent, or the idiotic manner in which this company is being managed? I hope Jack gets a first year law student, because Fridays conversation with their current lawyer, left me with the impression , this lawyer was in agreement with us and wanted nothing more to do with this mess and his best advice to Jack was resign. I guess thats our fault too. KAA

To: Paul Zalkind who wrote (5072)	5/24/1998 2:00:00 PM
From: Popiye	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

Paul: I do not see truth in Jack, Charles and unknown crew. I envision the new management taking the money and running - do your DD and check charles (Murray Island, King County, Washington State) out and you will find he is not going to run the company. He is in the business of making his money by dilution - he does not have a clue how to run a company. This guy has never ran a profitable company in his life and never will. Regarding first year lawyer mentioned - I never said lawyers were ethical or intelligent. We all knew this company was speculative, but, why should we be quiet when we are going to be ripped off by a carpetbagger.

To: Paul Zalkind who wrote (5072)	5/24/1998 8:37:00 PM
From: pureblood	Respond to of 6654

i agree with you to a certain point..i can understand where you are coming from...i felt the same way 6 months ago..however..there has been no news nothing from either party...if they are legit...then inform the people who buy stock..don't want or need or expect inside info, just progress reports... check over the last 6/7 months how many pr releases have been posted.. i don't have that many shares anymore, it's not the money....this stock is not going anywhere...it was once...people are just getting fed up. regards.... p.s. i do respect your views.