Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ztect who wrote (191)	5/24/1998 6:07:00 PM
From: LegalBeast	Respond to of 40688

Well, before I started law school, I was highly opinionated (As if I am not worse now?), but now I try to place myself is someone elses shoes before damming them. If I place myself in their shoes, I think they have their tit in a wringer. They screwed up and a lot of us have filed complaints about their misleading manipulation. The thing that is so damming is the issue of motive. Their action was so unprecedented. I think it is safe to assume that there was a profit motive. Whether it was as a result of their own market manipulation or as a result of some "other" paying them, I think the result is the same and at a minimum they should be forced to pay for their deception. In my Kingdom, they would be evicerated after being forced to eat the results of total emasculation ... But then in my kingdom such antics would not be tolerated. OK, soap box time ... The market is really the only bastion of supply and demand that we actually have. It is the folks like these and MMs that take even that away from us. I love a casino as much as the next gambaholic, but at least there where the cards are stacked against you, you still have rules that everyone knows and plays by ...