Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (74)	5/24/1998 9:14:00 PM
From: Dragonfly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 880

let me tell you that a poll tax is not the same thing as a political literacy test. No doubt you find the latter a great threat to your franchise. See, you prove my point for me. I knew you didn't know what it was. Thanks. Dragonfly

To: Zoltan! who wrote (74)	5/24/1998 9:18:00 PM
From: Dragonfly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 880

Remember in the last election cycle the Dems signed up all those illegal aliens and other non-citizens to obviate the votes of US citizens. Still waiting for a reason to believe you didn't make this up. Who went to jail for this fraud? Dragonfly

To: Zoltan! who wrote (74)	5/25/1998 3:19:00 AM
From: brian h	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 880

Zoltan! and all, We all know no matter you are a Republican or a Demorcrat that government involved bureaucracy! Without all issues (pros and cons) presented, the chief and top advisors will not make any final policy decision. It is hard to believe that anything with any remote possibility of damaging US security will pass the "Natioal Security Advisor" of any president (Republican or Demorcrat). The fact that these advisors need to act as non-partisan (just like any US soldier) and only care about US security - the defition of their title should stand an important role at examining this Loral issue here. Under Cliton, Bush and Reagan's administration's Natioal Security Advisors never oppose any waiver (from LORAL, Hughes, and the likes) for Chinese sat. launch service!!!!! So why is the big fuss? Any of you naysayer can be a good "National Security Advisor" while claiming you are patriotic? Are you that knowledgeable about national security than those current and past "Nation Security Advisors"? I am sure you will try to find as much facts and opinions (pros and cons) about the issue before you make any final decision to be like a good "Natioan Security Advisor"? Right? Therefore, go do more creditable research and report to us here If you are that interested about this issue and stop posting one side story (Cliton or LORAL bashing) or blame anybody but youself about patriotism. That will really show your patriotism to this country!!!!!! Tht will also help us LORAL longs to make our own decision to hold or dump LORAL!!!! That will show your creditability too!!!!!!! Negative comments without substance only show your igonance of the facts. Give it a thought! Brian H.