Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Georgia Bard's Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (2515)	5/24/1998 9:42:00 PM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9440

Understand your point, but the question is what comes next. Would any positive post, later proved false, subject a poster to inquiry? Where does one draw the line? For example, John Doe really likes XYZW...he heard on the ABC chat that XYZW is going to be bought out at $3.50 per share and it's trading at 22 cents. He states he has bought a position.... Now, if XYZW doesn't get bought up but runs up to $2.75, then stretching the guidelines would put John Doe at risk. Yes? Since I don't equate the above with falsely yelling fire in a crowded theater, I think we start to skirt a 1st amendment issue. That is why disclaimers are implicit. TG