SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Father Terrence who wrote (22166)5/25/1998 12:02:00 AM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
You are right, Terrence. I looked back, and you referred to being tried for murder, not executed.

This society makes it very, very difficult to be on a jury. Endless waits, significant discomfort, remuneration of only $5.00 a day in some places, and horrendous bureaucratic red tape are daunting, even to people who want to do their civic duty. Unfortunately, the second time they are called, many of our most intelligent potential jurors figure out a way not to serve.

Unfortunately, that leaves people who are retired, bored, on fixed incomes, and easily titillated as the majority of the jury pool. In some ways, a brain drain has taken place, obviously.



To: Father Terrence who wrote (22166)5/25/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: James R. Barrett  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
>>"In my personal experience, there are some pretty stupid people on juries."<<

FT, would you agree that the average IQ of the O.J. Simpson jury was below 65?

Jim