Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Syncrude who wrote (8713)	5/25/1998 6:08:00 PM
From: Martin E. Frankel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10836

Patrick, The below article (not from StockWatch) was posted here a short time ago. I am long KRY, but disturbed by the lack of clarification by their legal department as to what is really at issue. They are there to protect your and my investment (amongst other things, of course)... yes they really are! All we have seen so far is "interpretations" from our side and their side. Certainly the attorneys know what is before the SC. Why don't we? Why are we guessing? << Saturday, May 23 1998 1:52PM ET Court fight has cost Crystallex $15.4M By PETER KENNEDY Vancouver Bureau The Financial Post Crystallex International Corp. says it has cost $15.4 million so far to maintain its interest in a title dispute with Placer Dome Inc. over the huge Las Cristinas gold find in Venezuela. Financial statements released Friday also contain details of Crystallex's complex connection to the dispute, currently before the Supreme Court of Venezuela.Based in Vancouver, Crystallex got involved in the lawsuit in the past year by acquiring an interest in Inversora Mael CA, a Venezuelan company claiming rights to key areas of Las Cristinas known as concessions four and six. In its recent financial statements, Crystallex said the costs relating to the Mael acquisition have been capitalized as part of the cost of the acquisition of the mineral property. "The total cost incurred to Dec. 31, 1997,was $15.4 million,''it said. If the lawsuit does not succeed,that amount,plus any subsequent costs, will be expensed to operations. Meanwhile, Crystallex also says the outstanding Mael shares are the sole asset of a company known as Private Co., which is in turn controlled by certain Crystallex directors it did not name. Crystallex said it has secured an "exclusive call right'' to acquire all the shares of Private Co. The option can be exercised "at any time,'' by matching Private Co.'s commitment to pay out US$30 million in staged payments, including US$10 million in cash. It said the call right is irrevocable and unconditional, unless anyone acquires a 20% stake in Crystallex without the prior consent of the directors. Crystallex is waiting for the Venezuelan Supreme Court to decide whether or not it will be allowed to appeal a ruling that was announced last July. At the time,the court refused to allow Crystallex to challenge a ruling under which Placer's gold mining rights had been upheld.Eugenio Hernandez-Breton, the Venezuela lawyer acting for Vancouver-based Placer, said he has "no idea'' when the court will make its decision. "The court is not subject to any deadline. But we expect it will be some time this year.'' On Friday, Crystallex shares (KRY/TSE) closed unchanged at $6. >> The last paragraph is what I find disturbing as it seems to be contrary to what has been posted here numerous times. According to my take on the matter, La Cristinas 4 & 6 were and are the property of KRY and, as such were gazetted by order of the SC. That is not what the news article says... and KRY is not contradicting it. No, KRY's management can't answer every phone call, etc.. That's why they hire PR firms or have others to do the clarifications. Don't you agree that the ownership and mining rights to La Cristinas 4 & 6 are KRY's most important potential possession? I'd like to hear some clarification. This paper isn't "StockWatch". Thanks in advance for your time and that of anyone else who cares to respond. Best always, Marty