Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Goalie who wrote (1265)	5/25/1998 3:48:00 PM
From: GULL	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7235

You should know better than anyone else. Goalie ask yourself a few questions: Why were you all so wrong in the outcome of the 'court' case? You were always so confident of the outcome. Why are the shares so depressed? The M1 was to be factored in at $11 according to CJ. Why offer the heirs $15 Million if they have no rights to M1? SUF backed out at court not the heirs. Why no NR on the homepage about the $15Million offer to the heirs? The garbled one that was released just confused everyone. Why not keep the facts simple? SUF backed out so as not to embarrass themselves in court. The Section 24 was already pending at that time so there was no trade-off as is made out.Why try and confuse the issue when it is so simple? Where will SUF find the $15 Million for the $300 Million M1? Bankers are not fools and no doubt will also wonder at SUF strategy.