SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (94)5/25/1998 6:50:00 PM
From: Dragonfly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 880
 
Finally! You attempt to back up your assertions:

TheTripp tapes are plenty of proof

Then why hasn't Kenneth star gotten Clinton indicted?

as is Monica's own proffer to the IC wherein she admitted to the sexual relationship that Bubba has categorically denied.

Uh, one person saying something is not proof that it happened, remember? I don't consider this evidence because it has not been presented to the people.

However, in terms of real, documented evidence, Monica has said, under oath, that she didn't have a relationship.

If she lied to Tripp, who cares, however lying under oath is perjury, therefore, I tend to believe her testimony over her private, not for broadcast, phone conversations.

That you see this as "proof" shows you don't know the definition of the word.

Interestingly, Gennifer Flowers captured Bubba on tape directing her to lie about their relationship

No, she didn't. It was shown that tape was manufactured.

That's all you have? My point stands.

Dragonfly



To: jlallen who wrote (94)5/25/1998 6:57:00 PM
From: Dragonfly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 880
 
The Tripp tapes are plenty of proof

Lets look it up for you: (from websters online)
Proof:
2. That degree of evidence which convinces the mind of any truth or fact, and produces belief; a test by facts or arguments that induce, or tend to induce, certainty of the judgment; conclusive evidence; demonstration.

See that word certainty there? Notice the use of the word conclusive? Shall I get those definitions too?

Monica could easily have been lying to Tripp, therfore, recordings of these conversations are, by definition, not proof.

As to whether they are evidence, well, I'll take sworn testimony more seriously anyday. So will a judge. So, if she lied in that testimony, they will have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

But, you can say you have some evidence. However, there is stronger evidence that directly contradicts it.

Dragonfly